Cem Ilkel vs Mikael Torpegaard H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ilkel VS Torpegaard Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Cem Ilkel and Mikael Torpegaard stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 16-07-2019 in the Second Round at the Gatineau Challenger, Ilkel got the win with 6-4 4-6 6-2. Ilkel stands at no. 807 in the rankings, whilst Torpegaard is no. Ret..
Cem Ilkel
Ranking
807 ( 05-07-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Mikael Torpegaard
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
166 ( 06-01-20)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
2
Total
0
2
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (21-08-1995)
Age
32 (08-05-1994)
185
Height
193
81
Weight
84
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Gavin Hopper
Coach
David Kass, Balazs Novak
2013
Turned Pro
2018
56% (438-338)
Career Total W/L
58% (152-112)
61% (288-181)
Career Hard W/L
51% (40-39)
44% (57-72)
Career Clay W/L
64% (53-30)
10% (1-9)
Career Grass W/L
20% (1-4)
55% (92-76)
Career Indoor W/L
60% (58-39)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$89,705
0% (0-1)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Ilkel VS Torpegaard H2H Matches played
|
Gatineau Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Jul 2019 R2 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6
4
4
6
6
2
|
|||||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Oct 2018 R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
|||||||
Ilkel VS Torpegaard Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Mikael Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 32 | 28 |
| Total Aces | 15 | 14 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 14 |
| Average Match Time | 2:8:16 | 2:8:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (106/189) | 60% (118/198) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (77/106) | 69% (82/118) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (43/83) | 43% (34/80) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (9/27) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Pts Won % | 41% (82/198) | 37% (69/189) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Cem Ilkel past matches
Before:
|
Istanbul Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
5
7
6
3
|
L
|
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Mikael Torpegaard past matches
Before:
|
|
Lexington Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 Aug 2022 R1 |
3
6
6
0
4
1
|
L
|
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Shymkent 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 May 2022 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Shymkent 1 Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 May 2022 R2 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 May 2022 R1 |
6
3
4
6
6
3
|
W
|
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Kaichi Uchida
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
26 Apr 2022 R1 |
6
3
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Jack Sock
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
51%
(
54 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ilkel VS Torpegaard matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Mikael Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (288/181) | 51% (40/39) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (631/440) | 52% (97/91) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5350/4741) | 50% (875/861) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (288/181) | 51% (40/39) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.42 |
| Total Aces | 1593 | 353 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.3 |
| Total Double Faults | 771 | 254 |
| Average Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1:32:31 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 886.43 | 667.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (12861/22032) | 57% (3011/5323) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9108/12861) | 71% (2134/3011) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4705/9171) | 51% (1176/2312) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (929/2274) | 43% (223/522) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (8844/22248) | 39% (2132/5488) |
| Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) | 33% (3/6) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (79/72) | 55% (32/26) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (198/90) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (280/457) | 51% (37/73) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (87/156) | 45% (10/22) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) | 41% (12/29) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/244) | 77% (44/34) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (280/34) | 23% (44/10) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) | 17% (35/6) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ilkel VS Torpegaard H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Navarro Vs Kostyuk Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 4th July 2026 (Day 6)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Liu Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Madison Keys vs Amanda Anisimova Wimbledon 2026 Preview
-
Navarro Vs Kostyuk Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 4th July 2026 (Day 6)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
