Cem Ilkel vs Ju-Hae Moon H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ilkel VS Moon Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Cem Ilkel and Ju-Hae Moon stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 12-04-2016 in the First Round at the Turkey F15, Ilkel got the win with 6-3 2-6 6-1. Ilkel stands at no. 807 in the rankings, whilst Moon is no. Ret..
Ranking
807 ( 04-06-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ilkel VS Moon H2H Matches played
|
|
Turkey F15 | ||||||||
|
12 Apr 2016 R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Ju-Hae Moon
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6
3
2
6
6
1
|
|||||||
Ilkel VS Moon Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Ju-Hae Moon |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (40/71) | 73% (49/67) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 78% (31/40) | 59% (29/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) | 50% (9/18) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 63% (5/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Pts Won % | 43% (29/67) | 38% (27/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Cem Ilkel past matches
|
|
Istanbul Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
5
7
6
3
|
L
|
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ju-Hae Moon past matches
|
|
M15 Daegu 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Aug 2022 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Changwon 1 | ||||||||
|
16 Oct 2019 R1 |
1
6
6
4
5
2
|
L
|
Seong-Gook Oh
Player
Ju-Hae Moon
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
53%
(
41 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Oct 2019 QF |
3
6
6
3
10
6
|
W
|
Ju-Hae Moon
Player
Oh-Hee Kwon
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Oct 2019 Q2 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Ju-Hae Moon
Player
Hao Yuan Ng
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Oct 2019 Q1 |
6
1
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Ilkel VS Moon matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Ju-Hae Moon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (288/181) | 49% (46/48) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (631/440) | 49% (98/104) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5350/4741) | 49% (842/878) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (288/181) | 49% (46/48) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 1593 | 40 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 771 | 156 |
| Average Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 881.87 | 795.84 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (12861/22032) | 69% (1803/2614) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9108/12861) | 60% (1074/1803) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4705/9171) | 40% (328/811) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (929/2274) | 51% (162/320) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (8844/22248) | 45% (1198/2663) |
| Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (79/72) | 23% (3/10) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (198/90) | 53% (43/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (280/457) | 49% (44/90) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (87/156) | 88% (7/8) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/244) | 93% (43/40) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (280/34) | 7% (43/3) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) | 12% (51/6) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ilkel VS Moon H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Sabalenka Vs Shnaider Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 3rd June 2026 (Day 10)
-
Shevchenko Vs Sanchez-Izquierdo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Perugia Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Topo Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Marcinko Vs Hennemann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Sabalenka Vs Shnaider Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 3rd June 2026 (Day 10)
-
Shevchenko Vs Sanchez-Izquierdo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Perugia Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Topo Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Marcinko Vs Hennemann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
