Cem Ilkel vs Daniel Masur H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ilkel VS Masur Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Cem Ilkel and Daniel Masur stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 27-04-2021 in the First Round at the Rome 2 Challenger, Masur got the win with 4-6 6-4 7-6(2). Ilkel stands at no. 807 in the rankings, whilst Masur is no. 379.
Cem Ilkel
Ranking
807 ( 06-07-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Daniel Masur
Ranking
379 ( 06-07-26)
Best Rank
176 ( 07-03-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
1
Total
1
0
Hard
1
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (21-08-1995)
Age
31 (06-11-1994)
185
Height
183
81
Weight
78
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Gavin Hopper
Coach
Lars Uebel
2013
Turned Pro
2013
56% (438-338)
Career Total W/L
57% (451-340)
61% (288-181)
Career Hard W/L
56% (102-79)
44% (57-72)
Career Clay W/L
55% (152-124)
10% (1-9)
Career Grass W/L
39% (9-14)
55% (92-76)
Career Indoor W/L
60% (188-123)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$156,200
0% (0-1)
YTD Win/Loss
62% (28-17)
Ilkel VS Masur H2H Matches played
|
Rome 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Apr 2021 R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Daniel Masur
65%
(
84 of
129)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
59 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
4
6
6
4
7
6
|
|||||||
|
Mallorca Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Aug 2019 R1 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Cem Ilkel
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6
3
6
4
|
|||||||
Ilkel VS Masur Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 24 | 28 |
| Total Aces | 4 | 14 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 5 |
| Average Match Time | 1:55:46 | 1:55:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (120/182) | 64% (95/148) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 57% (69/120) | 72% (68/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (33/62) | 43% (23/53) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 54% (7/13) | 56% (9/16) |
| Return Pts Won % | 39% (57/148) | 44% (80/182) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel past matches
Before:
|
|
Istanbul Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
5
7
6
3
|
L
|
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Daniel Masur past matches
Before:
|
|
Milan Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 Jun 2026 QF |
6
1
6
2
|
L
|
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Daniel Masur
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
7
6
3
6
1
|
W
|
Daniel Masur
Player
Oskari Paldanius
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
Nottingham 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
Jay Clarke
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tyler Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Daniel Masur
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Little Rock Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Daniel Masur
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ilkel VS Masur matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (288/181) | 56% (102/79) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (631/440) | 56% (227/180) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5350/4741) | 53% (2031/1826) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (288/181) | 56% (102/79) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Total Aces | 1593 | 616 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| Total Double Faults | 771 | 413 |
| Average Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1:8:40 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 171.72 | 758.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (12861/22032) | 62% (5529/8886) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9108/12861) | 71% (3902/5529) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4705/9171) | 50% (1678/3357) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (929/2274) | 41% (342/843) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (8844/22248) | 38% (3511/9123) |
| Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) | 14% (1/6) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (79/72) | 57% (55/42) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (198/90) | 63% (45/27) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (280/457) | 55% (98/177) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (87/156) | 52% (36/69) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) | 43% (21/49) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/244) | 84% (105/88) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (280/34) | 16% (105/17) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) | 16% (75/12) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ilkel VS Masur H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Bencic Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 5th July 2026 (Day 7)
-
Aliassime Vs Fokina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 5th July 2026 (Day 7)
-
Navarro Vs Kostyuk Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 4th July 2026 (Day 6)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Aliassime Vs Fokina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 5th July 2026 (Day 7)
-
Bencic Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 5th July 2026 (Day 7)
-
Madison Keys vs Amanda Anisimova Wimbledon 2026 Preview
-
Navarro Vs Kostyuk Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 4th July 2026 (Day 6)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
