Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Tomas Machac H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Zandschulp VS Machac Head to Head: 3 - 2
The H2H record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Tomas Machac stands at 3 - 2. In their last encounter on 29-08-2022 in the First Round at the U.S. Open - New York, Zandschulp got the win with 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 3-6 7-5. Zandschulp stands at no. 55 in the rankings, whilst Machac is no. 43.
Ranking
55 ( 30-05-26)
Best Rank
22 ( 29-08-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
43 ( 30-05-26)
Best Rank
20 ( 03-03-25)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
2
Recent Form
3
2
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
Zandschulp VS Machac H2H Matches played
|
|
U.S. Open - New York | ||||||||
|
29 Aug 2022 R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tomas Machac
54%
(
83 of
153)
1st Serve %
55%
(
94 of
170)
17
Aces
8
12
Double Faults
4
83%
(
69 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
62 of
94)
46%
(
32 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
52 of
153)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
63 of
170)
164
Total Points Won
159
|
3
6
7
6
6
1
3
6
7
5
|
|||||||
|
|
Liberec Challenger | ||||||||
|
07 Aug 2021 SF |
Tomas Machac
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6
2
6
2
|
|||||||
|
|
Koblenz Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Feb 2020 F |
Tomas Machac
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
6
3
4
6
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
M25 Stockholm 1 | ||||||||
|
27 Sep 2019 QF |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tomas Machac
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
62 of
86)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7
5
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
Glasgow Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 Sep 2019 R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tomas Machac
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6
4
6
3
|
|||||||
Zandschulp VS Machac Head to head matches stats
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Tomas Machac |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 6 |
| Games Won | 68 | 70 |
| Total Aces | 41 | 20 |
| Total Double Faults | 24 | 12 |
| Average Match Time | 2:10:46 | 2:10:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (254/445) | 58% (269/461) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (183/254) | 66% (178/269) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (87/191) | 56% (107/192) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (14/43) | 46% (16/35) |
| Return Pts Won % | 38% (176/461) | 39% (175/445) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp past matches
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
92 of
152)
1st Serve %
59%
(
93 of
157)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
64 of
93)
48%
(
29 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
60 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
66 of
157)
158
Total Points Won
151
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bordeaux Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
2
0
|
L
|
Quentin Halys
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
10 May 2026 R3 |
5
7
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Karen Khachanov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
53 of
64)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
H2H | |||||
|
08 May 2026 R2 |
2
6
6
2
7
6
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 May 2026 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Alexandre Muller
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Tomas Machac past matches
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
27 May 2026 R2 |
6
4
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tomas Machac
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
19
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 May 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Tomas Machac
Player
Zizou Bergs
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
09 May 2026 R2 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
07 May 2026 R1 |
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Tomas Machac
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
42 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
2
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Cameron Norrie
Player
Tomas Machac
66%
(
84 of
128)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
48 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
110)
120
Total Points Won
118
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Zandschulp VS Machac matches vs all opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Tomas Machac |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (78/59) | 67% (95/46) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (185/167) | 63% (227/132) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (1752/1684) | 54% (1863/1566) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (78/59) | 67% (95/46) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.51 | 0.45 |
| Total Aces | 853 | 765 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 594 | 325 |
| Average Match Time | 1:56:59 | 1:49:1 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 290.37 | 183.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (6601/10720) | 62% (6612/10605) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (4767/6601) | 73% (4801/6612) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1956/4119) | 53% (2128/3987) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (408/949) | 42% (440/1048) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (4215/10964) | 39% (4247/10923) |
| Slam W/L | 61% (19/12) | 69% (25/11) |
| Masters W/L | 48% (15/16) | 57% (17/13) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (33/25) | 64% (25/14) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 79% (22/6) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (64/112) | 70% (80/114) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (12/23) | 63% (15/24) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (31/55) | 58% (32/55) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 64% (30/47) | 63% (29/46) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (67/58) | 89% (85/76) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (67/9) | 8% (85/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (70/20) | 34% (56/19) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Zandschulp VS Machac H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Halys Vs Zverev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Teichmann Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Kostyuk Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Linette Vs Swiatek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Wang Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Halys Vs Zverev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Teichmann Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Kostyuk Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Linette Vs Swiatek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Wang Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
