Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Nerman Fatic H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Zandschulp VS Fatic Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Nerman Fatic stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 11-05-2019 in the Semifinals Round at the M25 Prijedor 1, Zandschulp got the win with 6-2 7-5. Zandschulp stands at no. 55 in the rankings, whilst Fatic is no. 276.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranking
55 ( 30-05-26)
Best Rank
22 ( 29-08-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Nerman Fatic
Ranking
276 ( 30-05-26)
Best Rank
191 ( 07-08-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (04-10-1995)
Age
31 (24-10-1994)
191
Height
191
85
Weight
88
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Peter Lucassen, Fred Hemmes
Coach
Patricio Remondegui
2016
Turned Pro
2014
60% (394-258)
Career Total W/L
58% (414-297)
57% (78-59)
Career Hard W/L
51% (43-42)
61% (184-116)
Career Clay W/L
61% (351-226)
44% (12-15)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-2)
64% (120-68)
Career Indoor W/L
43% (20-27)
$4,237,940
Career Prize Money
$121,995
50% (12-12)
YTD Win/Loss
50% (10-10)
Zandschulp VS Fatic H2H Matches played
|
M25 Prijedor 1 | ||||||||
|
11 May 2019 SF |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nerman Fatic
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6
2
7
5
|
|||||||
Zandschulp VS Fatic Head to head matches stats
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Total Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 9 |
| Average Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (40/69) | 78% (53/68) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (28/40) | 49% (26/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (8/29) | 20% (3/15) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 58% (7/12) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Pts Won % | 57% (39/68) | 48% (33/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp past matches
Before:
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
92 of
152)
1st Serve %
59%
(
93 of
157)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
64 of
93)
48%
(
29 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
60 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
66 of
157)
158
Total Points Won
151
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bordeaux Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
2
0
|
L
|
Quentin Halys
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
10 May 2026 R3 |
5
7
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Karen Khachanov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
53 of
64)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
H2H | |||||
|
08 May 2026 R2 |
2
6
6
2
7
6
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 May 2026 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Alexandre Muller
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nerman Fatic past matches
Before:
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
20 May 2026 Q2 |
2
6
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
76 of
106)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
108
|
H2H | |||||
|
19 May 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
Nerman Fatic
Player
Luka Mikrut
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Zagreb Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
7
6
1
|
L
|
Elmer Moller
Player
Nerman Fatic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
11 May 2026 QF |
7
5
6
0
|
W
|
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 May 2026 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Nerman Fatic
Player
Joshua Sheehy
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Zandschulp VS Fatic matches vs all opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (78/59) | 51% (43/42) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (185/167) | 53% (97/86) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (1752/1684) | 51% (852/803) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (78/59) | 51% (43/42) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.51 | 0.22 |
| Total Aces | 853 | 178 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 | 0.21 |
| Total Double Faults | 594 | 168 |
| Average Match Time | 1:56:59 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 290.37 | 1039.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (6601/10720) | 64% (2063/3216) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (4767/6601) | 66% (1365/2063) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1956/4119) | 47% (538/1153) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (408/949) | 46% (146/318) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (4215/10964) | 40% (1213/3045) |
| Slam W/L | 61% (19/12) | 25% (1/3) |
| Masters W/L | 48% (15/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (33/25) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 55% (37/30) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (64/112) | 53% (42/79) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (12/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (31/55) | 56% (9/16) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 64% (30/47) | 40% (8/20) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (67/58) | 85% (47/40) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (67/9) | 11% (47/5) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (70/20) | 11% (38/4) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Zandschulp VS Fatic H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Halys Vs Zverev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Teichmann Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Kostyuk Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Linette Vs Swiatek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Wang Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Halys Vs Zverev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Teichmann Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Kostyuk Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Linette Vs Swiatek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Wang Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 29th May 2026 (Day 5)
