Blake Bazarnik vs Andrew Carter H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Bazarnik VS Carter Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Blake Bazarnik and Andrew Carter stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 09-11-2013 in the Q1 round Round at the Champaign Challenger, Bazarnik got the win with 6-4 1-6 7-5. Bazarnik stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Carter is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
798 ( 08-07-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Bazarnik VS Carter H2H Matches played
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Nov 2013 Q1 |
Blake Bazarnik
Player
Andrew Carter
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
85
|
6
4
1
6
7
5
|
|||||||
Bazarnik VS Carter Head to head matches stats
| stats | Blake Bazarnik | Andrew Carter |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 1:44:4 | 1:44:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (51/88) | 56% (44/78) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (33/51) | 70% (31/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (20/37) | 56% (19/34) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 67% (4/6) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Pts Won % | 36% (28/78) | 40% (35/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Blake Bazarnik past matches
|
|
USA F3 | ||||||||
|
12 Jan 2015 Q1 |
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
12 Jan 2015 Pre-Q |
7
6
2
6
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
12 Jan 2015 Q2 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F2 | ||||||||
|
13 Jan 2014 Pre-Q |
6
0
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Nov 2013 Q2 |
6
2
1
6
6
2
|
L
|
Dennis Zivkovic
Player
Blake Bazarnik
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Andrew Carter past matches
|
|
USA F15 (Winston-Salem) | ||||||||
|
17 Jun 2018 Q1 |
6
4
2
6
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F13 (Winston-Salem) | ||||||||
|
11 Jun 2018 Q2 |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
10 Jun 2018 Q1 |
4
6
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
28 Apr 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Andrew Carter
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F8 (Calabasas) | ||||||||
|
18 Mar 2018 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Bazarnik VS Carter matches vs all opponents
| stats | Blake Bazarnik | Andrew Carter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 40% (55/81) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 47% (7/8) | 42% (129/180) |
| Games Won/Lost | 49% (66/68) | 47% (1309/1491) |
| Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 40% (55/81) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 106 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 0.1 |
| Total Double Faults | 7 | 138 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 886.33 | 987.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (62/98) | 60% (2336/3870) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 60% (37/62) | 60% (1403/2336) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (19/36) | 47% (721/1534) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 100% (3/3) | 46% (178/384) |
| Return Points Won % | 29% (22/76) | 40% (1549/3856) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (1/12) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 47% (15/17) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 43% (39/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) | 40% (55/136) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 52% (16/31) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) | 49% (18/37) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 87% (52/45) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 13% (52/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) | 12% (84/10) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Bazarnik VS Carter H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Sonmez Vs Linette Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Jong Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Shevchenko Vs Mrva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tan Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sonmez Vs Linette Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Jong Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Shevchenko Vs Mrva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tan Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
