Benjamin Hannestad vs Ryan Nijboer H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Hannestad VS Nijboer Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Benjamin Hannestad and Ryan Nijboer stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 05-08-2021 in the Second Round at the M15 Frederiksberg 1, Hannestad got the win with 6-1 4-6 6-2. Hannestad stands at no. 1662 in the rankings, whilst Nijboer is no. 488.
Ranking
1662 ( 15-07-26)
Best Rank
919 ( 19-06-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
488 ( 15-07-26)
Best Rank
371 ( 26-08-24)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Nijboer upcoming match (16-07-26)
Hannestad VS Nijboer H2H Matches played
|
|
M15 Frederiksberg 1 | ||||||||
|
05 Aug 2021 R2 |
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
6
1
4
6
6
2
|
|||||||
Hannestad VS Nijboer Head to head matches stats
| stats | Benjamin Hannestad | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 10 |
| Average Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (59/90) | 55% (42/77) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 61% (36/59) | 50% (21/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (19/31) | 49% (17/35) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 46% (6/13) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Pts Won % | 51% (39/77) | 39% (35/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Benjamin Hannestad past matches
|
|
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio 2 | ||||||||
|
16 Feb 2026 Q2 |
6
7
7
5
10
8
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio 1 | ||||||||
|
12 Feb 2026 R1 |
3
6
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Feb 2026 QF |
6
4
0
6
10
8
|
W
|
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Goncalo Marques
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
51%
(
30 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 Feb 2026 Q2 |
6
1
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Oslo 1 | ||||||||
|
07 Jan 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Matt Ponchet
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ryan Nijboer past matches
|
|
Bunschoten Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Jul 2026 R1 |
4
6
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Mika Brunold
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Jul 2026 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
12 Jul 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Amit Vales
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Liege Challenger | ||||||||
|
07 Jul 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Jul 2026 QF |
6
2
6
1
|
W
|
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Kasra Rahmani
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hannestad VS Nijboer matches vs all opponents
| stats | Benjamin Hannestad | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (56/42) | 59% (104/72) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (117/92) | 58% (234/170) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (1045/885) | 54% (2017/1725) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (56/42) | 59% (104/72) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 0.26 |
| Total Aces | 82 | 479 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 0.28 |
| Total Double Faults | 164 | 517 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 559.03 | 707.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1710/2752) | 64% (6161/9641) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1095/1710) | 68% (4202/6161) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (474/1042) | 46% (1604/3480) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 45% (131/294) | 44% (462/1055) |
| Return Points Won % | 42% (1118/2670) | 42% (4120/9920) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (56/40) | 60% (102/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (54/95) | 59% (103/174) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 46% (13/28) | 43% (21/49) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (9/16) | 50% (26/52) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (56/51) | 89% (105/93) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (56/4) | 11% (105/12) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (42/5) | 15% (71/11) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Hannestad VS Nijboer H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kawa Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Angelo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Timofeeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Dodig Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gibert Vs Kalinina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Kawa Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Angelo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Timofeeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Dodig Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gibert Vs Kalinina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)