Anish Ranjalkar vs Prabir Mukesh Chavda H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ranjalkar VS Chavda Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Anish Ranjalkar and Prabir Mukesh Chavda stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 22-03-2026 in the Q1 round Round at the M15 Ahmedabad 1, Ranjalkar got the win with 7-6(6) 6-4. Ranjalkar stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Chavda is no. -.
Ranking
- ( 03-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
- ( 03-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ranjalkar VS Chavda H2H Matches played
|
|
M15 Ahmedabad 1 | ||||||||
|
22 Mar 2026 Q1 |
Anish Ranjalkar
Player
Prabir Mukesh Chavda
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
Ranjalkar VS Chavda Head to head matches stats
| stats | Anish Ranjalkar | Prabir Mukesh Chavda |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 2:0:37 | 2:0:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) | 64% (38/59) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 63% (32/51) | 61% (23/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) | 33% (7/21) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 67% (6/9) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Pts Won % | 49% (29/59) | 45% (35/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Anish Ranjalkar past matches
|
|
M15 Ahmedabad 1 | ||||||||
|
23 Mar 2026 Q2 |
6
3
4
6
10
8
|
L
|
Rishabdev Raman
Player
Anish Ranjalkar
47%
(
41 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Mar 2026 Q1 |
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
Anish Ranjalkar
Player
Prabir Mukesh Chavda
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Zahra 2 | ||||||||
|
01 Feb 2026 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Hurghada 2 | ||||||||
|
11 Jan 2026 Q1 |
2
6
6
2
10
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Hurghada 1 | ||||||||
|
04 Jan 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Prabir Mukesh Chavda past matches
|
|
M15 Ahmedabad 1 | ||||||||
|
22 Mar 2026 Q1 |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Anish Ranjalkar
Player
Prabir Mukesh Chavda
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ranjalkar VS Chavda matches vs all opponents
| stats | Anish Ranjalkar | Prabir Mukesh Chavda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 25% (4/12) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Won/Lost | 39% (61/97) | 43% (10/13) |
| Hard W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 0.18 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 | 0.36 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 4 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 390.86 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (92/155) | 64% (38/59) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 58% (53/92) | 61% (23/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (29/63) | 33% (7/21) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 48% (10/21) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points Won % | 48% (71/147) | 45% (35/78) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 14% (1/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (5/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ranjalkar VS Chavda H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)