Head to head career and match stats comparison between Li vs Peer. For active players who have an upcoming match between them we will show our machine learning H2H prediction here for Li, Peer.
Na Li
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
2 ( 04-08-14)
Grand Slams
2
Masters
1
Others
12
Recent Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Shahar Peer
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
11 ( 25-04-11)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Others
9
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
2
Total
2
2
Hard
1
0
Clay
1
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
42 (26-02-1982)
Age
36 (01-05-1987)
1.72m
Height
1.70m
65 kg
Weight
60 kg
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Backhand
Coach
Pro (1999)/Retired (September 19, 2014)
Turned Pro
Pro (2004)
70% (402-169)
Career Total W/L
58% (388-277)
73% (260-96)
Career Hard W/L
60% (247-165)
69% (76-34)
Career Clay W/L
58% (84-62)
65% (36-19)
Career Grass W/L
44% (18-23)
60% (30-20)
Career Indoor W/L
59% (39-27)
$12,713,039
Career Prize Money
$2,894,734
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
Li VS Peer Head to head matches stats
| stats | Na Li | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| H2H All Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 5 |
| Games Won | 45 | 36 |
| Total Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Total DFs | 12 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (226/326) | 70% (199/286) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (134/226) | 57% (113/199) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (48/100) | 41% (36/87) |
| Total BPs Won% | 50% (17/34) | 28% (13/46) |
| Return Pts Won % | 48% (137/286) | 44% (144/326) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total TBs W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Li VS Peer H2h Matches played
|
Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open - Madrid | ||||||||
|
14 May 2010 QF |
Shahar Peer
Player
Na Li
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
69%
(
85 of
124)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
6
4
3
6
6
4
|
|||||||
|
Barclays Dubai Tennis Championships - Dubai | ||||||||
|
18 Feb 2010 QF |
Shahar Peer
Player
Na Li
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
7
5
3
0
|
|||||||
|
|
U.S. Open - New York | ||||||||
|
25 Aug 2008 R1 |
Na Li
Player
Shahar Peer
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
2
6
6
0
6
1
|
|||||||
|
|
Qatar Total Open - Doha | ||||||||
|
21 Feb 2008 R3 |
Na Li
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6
1
6
3
|
|||||||
Li VS Peer matches vs all opponents
| stats | Na Li | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| Total DFs | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total BPs Won% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total TBs W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Na Li past matches
Before:
|
Wimbledon - London | ||||||||
|
27 Jun 2014 R3 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 Jun 2014 R2 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Shahar Peer past matches
Before:
|
|
Abierto Monterrey Afirme - Monterrey | ||||||||
|
27 Feb 2016 Q1 |
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro | ||||||||
|
13 Feb 2016 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
view more
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Li VS Peer H2H
