Meible Chi vs Amanda Rodgers H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Chi VS Rodgers Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Meible Chi and Amanda Rodgers stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 19-06-2017 in the Q2 round Round at the Baton Rouge, Rodgers got the win with 6-4 6-4. Chi stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Rodgers is no. Ret..
Meible Chi
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Amanda Rodgers
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
491 ( 27-08-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
27 (19-05-1999)
Age
33 (22-03-1993)
Height
Weight
Plays
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
59% (13-9)
Career Total W/L
49% (124-130)
33% (2-4)
Career Hard W/L
49% (45-47)
69% (11-5)
Career Clay W/L
50% (69-69)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
Career Indoor W/L
42% (10-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Chi VS Rodgers H2H Matches played
|
Baton Rouge | ||||||||
|
19 Jun 2017 Q2 |
6
4
6
4
|
||||||||
Chi VS Rodgers Head to head matches stats
| stats | Meible Chi | Amanda Rodgers |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Meible Chi past matches
Before:
view more
Amanda Rodgers past matches
Before:
|
W25 Osprey | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2019 Q1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
W25 Daytona Beach | ||||||||
|
15 Jan 2019 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Jan 2019 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Macon | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2018 Q1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Florence | ||||||||
|
16 Oct 2018 QF |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Chi VS Rodgers matches vs all opponents
| stats | Meible Chi | Amanda Rodgers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 49% (45/47) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 33% (4/8) | 50% (105/105) |
| Games Won/Lost | 47% (55/61) | 50% (927/911) |
| Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 49% (45/47) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 43 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 55 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 858.67 | 667.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (776/1278) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (462/776) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 47% (235/502) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 42% (61/145) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 42% (529/1270) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 47% (31/35) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (14/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) | 49% (45/91) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 44% (12/27) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 78% (51/40) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 22% (51/11) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) | 12% (41/5) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Chi VS Rodgers H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cecchinato Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Parma Challenger – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Cecchinato Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Parma Challenger – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
