Gisela Dulko vs Ansley Cargill H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Dulko VS Cargill Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Gisela Dulko and Ansley Cargill stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 20-10-2003 in the Second Round at the Paducah, Dulko got the win with 6-4 6-2. Dulko stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Cargill is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
26 ( 21-11-05)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
4
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
90 ( 05-05-03)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dulko VS Cargill H2H Matches played
|
Paducah | ||||||||
|
20 Oct 2003 R2 |
6
4
6
2
|
||||||||
Dulko VS Cargill Head to head matches stats
| stats | Gisela Dulko | Ansley Cargill |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gisela Dulko past matches
|
Wimbledon - London | ||||||||
|
20 Jun 2012 Q2 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
19 Jun 2012 Q1 |
7
5
4
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
23 May 2012 Q1 |
1
6
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Vesna Dolonc
Player
Gisela Dulko
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
13 May 2012 QF |
6
3
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Player
Gisela Dulko
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
114)
9
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
H2H | |||||
|
12 May 2012 Q1 |
6
4
5
7
6
2
|
W
|
Gisela Dulko
Player
Carla Suarez Navarro
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ansley Cargill past matches
|
|
U.S. Open - New York | ||||||||
|
25 Aug 2006 QF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
24 Aug 2006 Q2 |
6
4
6
7
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
23 Aug 2006 Q1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Rogers Cup - Montreal | ||||||||
|
12 Aug 2006 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Vancouver | ||||||||
|
31 Jul 2006 SF |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Dulko VS Cargill matches vs all opponents
| stats | Gisela Dulko | Ansley Cargill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 49% (115/122) | 59% (88/62) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 48% (254/275) | 56% (196/156) |
| Games Won/Lost | 49% (2336/2470) | 53% (1723/1557) |
| Hard W/L | 49% (115/122) | 59% (88/62) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 209 | 1 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 504 | 2 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 661.26 | 829.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (4686/7807) | 68% (92/135) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2809/4686) | 59% (54/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1353/3123) | 37% (16/43) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 46% (398/870) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points Won % | 43% (3357/7834) | 28% (27/95) |
| Slam W/L | 49% (19/20) | 57% (12/9) |
| Masters W/L | 47% (39/44) | 31% (4/9) |
| Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 48% (43/46) | 55% (17/14) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (11/11) | 62% (46/28) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 82% (9/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (112/233) | 59% (88/150) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 62% (28/45) | 58% (19/33) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 54% (32/59) | 62% (32/52) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (115/100) | 83% (83/69) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (115/15) | 17% (83/14) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (122/15) | 28% (67/19) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Dulko VS Cargill H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
