Gabriela Ce vs Emily Da Silva Chang H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ce VS Chang Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Gabriela Ce and Emily Da Silva Chang stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 30-04-2012 in the First Round at the Sao Jose Dos Campos, Ce got the win with 6-1 6-1. Ce stands at no. 351 in the rankings, whilst Chang is no. Ret..
Gabriela Ce
Ranking
351 ( 03-06-26)
Best Rank
221 ( 09-09-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Emily Da Silva Chang
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
2
Total
0
1
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
33 (03-03-1993)
Age
30 (13-02-1996)
Height
Weight
Left-Handed
Plays
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
56% (499-391)
Career Total W/L
46% (36-42)
47% (72-82)
Career Hard W/L
36% (5-9)
58% (424-301)
Career Clay W/L
48% (31-33)
0% (0-2)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
33% (3-6)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-0)
$26,182
Career Prize Money
$0
45% (9-11)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Ce upcoming match (03-06-26)
Ce VS Chang H2H Matches played
|
Sao Jose Dos Campos | ||||||||
|
30 Apr 2012 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
||||||||
|
Ribeirao Preto | ||||||||
|
02 Apr 2012 R1 |
6
0
6
3
|
||||||||
Ce VS Chang Head to head matches stats
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Emily Da Silva Chang |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 5 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Gabriela Ce past matches
Before:
|
|
W35 Bol | ||||||||
|
29 May 2026 QF |
7
6
6
1
|
L
|
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Gabriela Ce
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
|
W
|
Gabriela Ce
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
13
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 May 2026 R1 |
2
1
|
W
|
Gabriela Ce
Player
Lea Boskovic
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
15
Total Points Won
13
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
W50 Portoroz | ||||||||
|
20 May 2026 R1 |
2
6
6
4
6
1
|
L
|
Julie Struplova
Player
Gabriela Ce
77%
(
82 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Parma Ladies Open - Parma | ||||||||
|
11 May 2026 QF |
6
0
3
6
6
4
|
L
|
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Gabriela Ce
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Emily Da Silva Chang past matches
Before:
|
|
W25 Florianopolis | ||||||||
|
23 Jan 2022 Q1 |
6
0
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
W25 Florianopolis | ||||||||
|
17 Jan 2022 QF |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Emily Da Silva Chang
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
H2H | |||||
|
16 Jan 2022 Q1 |
7
6
3
6
10
6
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
W25 Blumenau-Gaspar | ||||||||
|
12 Jan 2022 R1 |
6
3
7
5
|
L
|
Zuzana Zlochova
Player
Emily Da Silva Chang
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Jan 2022 QF |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
Emily Da Silva Chang
Player
Beatriz Verdial
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ce VS Chang matches vs all opponents
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Emily Da Silva Chang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 47% (72/82) | 36% (5/9) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 47% (163/183) | 33% (10/20) |
| Games Won/Lost | 49% (1528/1612) | 41% (109/158) |
| Hard W/L | 47% (72/82) | 36% (5/9) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 41 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 0.04 |
| Total Double Faults | 276 | 5 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 691.92 | 807 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (3582/5312) | 55% (23/42) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2098/3582) | 48% (11/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (741/1730) | 21% (4/19) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 46% (291/639) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points Won % | 45% (2377/5307) | 38% (20/53) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 35% (35/64) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 77% (34/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (71/151) | 36% (5/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 59% (19/32) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (21/42) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (75/60) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (75/15) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (78/11) | 10% (10/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ce VS Chang H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
