Head to head career and match stats comparison between Maden vs Quigley. For active players who have an upcoming match between them we will show our machine learning H2H prediction here for Maden, Quigley.
Ranking
784 ( 19-04-24)
Best Rank
96 ( 24-06-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Others
8
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
297 ( 08-02-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Others
1
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
Maden VS Quigley Head to head matches stats
stats | Yannick Maden | Eric Quigley |
---|---|---|
H2H All Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
Total DFs | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total BPs Won% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total TBs W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Maden VS Quigley H2h Matches played
USA F6 | |||||||||
17 Feb 2014 F |
7
6
6
1
|
Maden VS Quigley matches vs all opponents
stats | Yannick Maden | Eric Quigley |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces Per Game | 0 | 0 |
Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
Total DFs | 0 | 0 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total BPs Won% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total TBs W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Yannick Maden past matches
Lille Challenger | |||||||||
21 Mar 2022 R1 |
M. Jaziri
PR
Y. Maden
PR
|
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Malek Jaziri
Player
Yannick Maden
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | ||||
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells | |||||||||
08 Mar 2022 Q1 |
5
4
|
L
|
Mats Moraing
Player
Yannick Maden
40%
(
10 of
25)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
H2H |
view more
Eric Quigley past matches
Lexington Challenger | |||||||||
31 Jul 2017 R1 |
E. Quigley
WC
|
7
6
6
2
|
L
|
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Eric Quigley
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | ||||
Binghamton Challenger | |||||||||
25 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Christian Harrison
Player
Eric Quigley
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
H2H |
view more