Todd Martin vs Ivan Lendl H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Martin VS Lendl Head to Head: 1 - 4
The H2H record between Todd Martin and Ivan Lendl stands at 1 - 4. In their last encounter on 10-01-1994 in the Semifinals Round at the Sydney, Lendl got the win with 6-4 6-2. Martin stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Lendl is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
4 ( 13-09-99)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
8
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1 ( 28-02-83)
Grand Slams
26
Masters
61
Main Tour
229
Recent Form
1
4
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
Martin VS Lendl H2H Matches played
|
|
Sydney | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 1994 SF |
6
4
6
2
|
||||||||
|
|
Tokyo | ||||||||
|
11 Oct 1993 F |
6
4
6
4
|
||||||||
|
|
Sydney | ||||||||
|
04 Oct 1993 R1 |
4
6
7
6
6
4
|
||||||||
|
|
Tokyo | ||||||||
|
12 Oct 1992 R2 |
7
5
2
6
7
5
|
||||||||
|
|
Canadian Open | ||||||||
|
20 Jul 1992 R2 |
6
3
6
2
|
||||||||
Martin VS Lendl Head to head matches stats
| stats | Todd Martin | Ivan Lendl |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 9 |
| Games Won | 52 | 68 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) | 80% (4/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Todd Martin past matches
|
|
U.S. Open - New York | ||||||||
|
30 Aug 2004 R1 |
4
6
6
4
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Fabrice Santoro
Player
Todd Martin
50%
(
62 of
125)
1st Serve %
69%
(
88 of
128)
8
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
62 of
88)
59%
(
37 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
43 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
122
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
TD Waterhouse Cup - Long Island | ||||||||
|
23 Aug 2004 R1 |
1
6
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C. | ||||||||
|
16 Aug 2004 R1 |
6
7
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Wimbledon - London | ||||||||
|
25 Jun 2004 R2 |
6
3
6
2
4
6
6
3
|
L
|
Sjeng Schalken
Player
Todd Martin
76%
(
84 of
110)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
112)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
63 of
84)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
56 of
79)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 Jun 2004 R1 |
4
6
6
3
7
6
4
6
9
7
|
W
|
Todd Martin
Player
Guillermo Canas
63%
(
115 of
183)
1st Serve %
67%
(
124 of
186)
19
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
10
77%
(
88 of
115)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
89 of
124)
59%
(
40 of
68)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
30%
(
55 of
183)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
61 of
186)
189
Total Points Won
180
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ivan Lendl past matches
view more
Martin VS Lendl matches vs all opponents
| stats | Todd Martin | Ivan Lendl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 64% (181/100) | 83% (379/77) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 60% (472/313) | 78% (921/263) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (4129/3618) | 61% (6620/4234) |
| Hard W/L | 64% (181/100) | 83% (379/77) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 130 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 55 | 0 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 887.76 | 974.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (702/1101) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 76% (534/702) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (213/399) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 39% (25/64) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Won % | 34% (364/1077) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 70% (58/25) | 85% (105/18) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (59/39) | 84% (101/19) |
| Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (52/30) | 82% (171/38) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (123/195) | 82% (245/297) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (56/83) | 85% (129/152) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 58% (76/131) | 43% (17/40) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (54/94) | 65% (53/82) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (164/141) | 95% (354/336) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (164/22) | 5% (354/17) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (117/39) | 39% (97/38) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Martin VS Lendl H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Molcan Vs Ofner Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Generali Open – Kitzbuhel – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gaston Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Millennium Estoril Open – Estoril – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Blinkova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Livesport Prague Open – Prague – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Samson Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Livesport Prague Open – Prague – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Baez Vs Kecmanovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Generali Open – Kitzbuhel – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Ofner Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Generali Open – Kitzbuhel – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gaston Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Millennium Estoril Open – Estoril – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Blinkova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Livesport Prague Open – Prague – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Samson Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Livesport Prague Open – Prague – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Baez Vs Kecmanovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Generali Open – Kitzbuhel – 21st July 2026 (Day 2)
