Timo Nieminen vs Adam Chadaj H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Nieminen VS Chadaj Head to Head: 3 - 0
The H2H record between Timo Nieminen and Adam Chadaj stands at 3 - 0. In their last encounter on 04-02-2013 in the Second Round at the Great Britain F4, Nieminen got the win with 3-6 7-5 6-2. Nieminen stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Chadaj is no. Ret..
Timo Nieminen
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
254 ( 21-07-03)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Adam Chadaj
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
202 ( 22-08-05)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
3
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
2
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
44 (06-10-1981)
Age
42 (01-05-1984)
185
Height
178
76
Weight
72
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Unknown
Backhand
Unknown
Markku Nieminen
Coach
2000
Turned Pro
2001
58% (429-311)
Career Total W/L
59% (349-246)
57% (40-30)
Career Hard W/L
60% (96-65)
59% (245-169)
Career Clay W/L
59% (212-145)
38% (3-5)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-1)
57% (141-107)
Career Indoor W/L
54% (41-35)
$1,300
Career Prize Money
$19,360
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Nieminen VS Chadaj H2H Matches played
|
Great Britain F4 | ||||||||
|
04 Feb 2013 R2 |
3
6
7
5
6
2
|
||||||||
|
Alphen Challenger | ||||||||
|
07 Sep 2009 QF |
4
6
6
3
6
3
|
||||||||
|
|
LTA Wrexham Challenger - Wrexham | ||||||||
|
22 Jan 2007 Q1 |
6
2
6
1
|
||||||||
Nieminen VS Chadaj Head to head matches stats
| stats | Timo Nieminen | Adam Chadaj |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 44 | 28 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Timo Nieminen past matches
Before:
|
|
Tampere Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Jul 2013 R1 |
4
6
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Timo Nieminen
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Estonia F1 | ||||||||
|
15 Jul 2013 R1 |
2
6
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
SkiStar Swedish Open - Bastad | ||||||||
|
06 Jul 2013 Q1 |
6
4
6
1
|
L
|
Matthias Bachinger
Player
Timo Nieminen
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Netherlands F2 | ||||||||
|
17 Jun 2013 R1 |
6
4
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Netherlands F1 | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2013 R1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Adam Chadaj past matches
Before:
|
|
Poland F4 (Ustron) | ||||||||
|
21 May 2018 R1 |
1
0
|
L
|
Piotr Matuszewski
Player
Adam Chadaj
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
4
Total Points Won
2
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Poland F3 (Ustron) | ||||||||
|
15 May 2018 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Dante Gennaro
Player
Adam Chadaj
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Poland F1 (Wisla) | ||||||||
|
01 May 2018 R1 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Adam Chadaj
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Turkey F10 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
13 Mar 2018 R1 |
7
5
7
5
|
L
|
Peter Torebko
Player
Adam Chadaj
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Turkey F48 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
22 Dec 2017 QF |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Dante Gennaro
Player
Adam Chadaj
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nieminen VS Chadaj matches vs all opponents
| stats | Timo Nieminen | Adam Chadaj |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (40/30) | 60% (96/65) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (88/68) | 57% (213/160) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (756/691) | 53% (1771/1584) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (40/30) | 60% (96/65) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.01 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 4 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 35 | 5 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1152.04 | 1129.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (187/310) | 57% (83/146) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 59% (111/187) | 53% (44/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (46/123) | 49% (31/63) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 63% (15/24) | 53% (10/19) |
| Return Points Won % | 42% (125/299) | 49% (71/145) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 56% (29/23) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (28/19) | 63% (66/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (40/70) | 60% (95/159) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 63% (12/19) | 61% (23/38) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (8/16) | 58% (31/53) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (36/33) | 89% (88/78) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (36/3) | 11% (88/10) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (34/7) | 25% (73/18) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Nieminen VS Chadaj H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kawa Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Angelo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Timofeeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Dodig Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gibert Vs Kalinina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Kawa Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Angelo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Timofeeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Dodig Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gibert Vs Kalinina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
