Tad Maclean vs David Guez H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Maclean VS Guez Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Tad Maclean and David Guez stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 27-09-2017 in the Second Round at the Great Britain F6 (Barnstaple), Guez got the win with 7-6(3) 6-3. Maclean stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Guez is no. Ret..
Tad Maclean
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1580 ( 30-04-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
David Guez
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
116 ( 05-07-10)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
1
0
Grass
0
25 (18-08-2000)
Age
43 (08-12-1982)
Height
185
Weight
75
Plays
Right-Handed
Backhand
Unknown
Coach
Rosant Philippe
Turned Pro
55% (6-5)
Career Total W/L
61% (641-414)
0% (0-1)
Career Hard W/L
66% (184-93)
0% (0-1)
Career Clay W/L
56% (198-153)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
25% (2-6)
67% (6-3)
Career Indoor W/L
61% (257-162)
$0
Career Prize Money
$215,535
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Maclean VS Guez H2H Matches played
|
Great Britain F6 (Barnstaple) | ||||||||
|
27 Sep 2017 R2 |
David Guez
Player
Tad Maclean
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7
6
6
3
|
|||||||
Maclean VS Guez Head to head matches stats
| stats | Tad Maclean | David Guez |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (40/65) | 56% (35/63) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (26/40) | 83% (29/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) | 57% (16/28) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (2/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Pts Won % | 29% (18/63) | 42% (27/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tad Maclean past matches
Before:
|
|
M25 Columbus 1 | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2021 QF |
6
3
1
6
10
4
|
L
|
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
Player
Tad Maclean
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Nov 2021 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
M25 Dublin 1 | ||||||||
|
30 Jul 2019 QF |
4
6
6
2
12
10
|
L
|
Sean Hodkin
Player
Tad Maclean
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Jul 2019 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
USA F29 (Birmingham) | ||||||||
|
26 Oct 2018 Pre-Q |
6
1
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
David Guez past matches
Before:
|
|
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 Nov 2018 QF |
6
2
4
6
6
2
|
L
|
Zizou Bergs
Player
David Guez
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
04 Nov 2018 Q2 |
2
6
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
David Guez
Player
Erik Crepaldi
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 Nov 2018 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
W
|
David Guez
Player
Edgar Jeanmougin
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Barcelona Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2018 R1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Matteo Viola
Player
David Guez
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
37%
(
28 of
75)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
H2H | |||||
|
Cassis Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Sep 2018 Q2 |
5
7
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Antoine Escoffier
Player
David Guez
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Maclean VS Guez matches vs all opponents
| stats | Tad Maclean | David Guez |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 66% (184/93) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 33% (1/2) | 63% (393/233) |
| Games Won/Lost | 43% (13/17) | 56% (3138/2499) |
| Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 66% (184/93) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.1 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 275 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.12 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 330 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 553 | 1029.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6447/10720) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (4168/6447) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 51% (2170/4273) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 49% (627/1292) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 45% (4675/10404) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (16/16) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (60/51) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 82% (107/23) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 67% (181/271) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 50% (26/52) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 64% (44/69) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 93% (170/158) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 7% (170/12) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 24% (107/26) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Maclean VS Guez H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Yastremska Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Yastremska Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
