Stephane Robert vs Samuel Groth H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Robert VS Groth Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Stephane Robert and Samuel Groth stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 03-01-2013 in the Second Round at the Noumea Challenger, Groth got the win with 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2. Robert stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Groth is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
50 ( 24-10-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Robert VS Groth H2H Matches played
|
|
Noumea Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Jan 2013 R2 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Stephane Robert
57%
(
63 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
19
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
2
6
7
6
6
2
|
|||||||
Robert VS Groth Head to head matches stats
| stats | Stephane Robert | Samuel Groth |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 19 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 6 |
| Average Match Time | 2:9:35 | 2:9:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (44/86) | 57% (63/110) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (31/44) | 78% (49/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) | 40% (19/47) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 23% (3/13) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Pts Won % | 38% (42/110) | 36% (31/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Stephane Robert past matches
|
|
Turin Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Feb 2022 Q1 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
Arthur Fils
Player
Stephane Robert
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Luedenscheid Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Aug 2021 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Dayne Kelly
Player
Stephane Robert
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
30%
(
14 of
47)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Todi Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2021 Q1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Stephane Robert
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
All Lower level tournaments | ||||||||
|
19 Aug 2020 R1 |
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
18 Aug 2020 R1 |
7
5
4
6
10
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Samuel Groth past matches
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Robert VS Groth matches vs all opponents
| stats | Stephane Robert | Samuel Groth |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (125/93) | 53% (199/177) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 55% (288/232) | 52% (471/437) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (2575/2387) | 51% (4747/4531) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (125/93) | 53% (199/177) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.39 | 0.6 |
| Total Aces | 944 | 2717 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 | 0.21 |
| Total Double Faults | 759 | 959 |
| Average Match Time | 1:9:33 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 803.55 | 932.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (7417/13882) | 59% (8692/14690) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (5320/7417) | 79% (6841/8692) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3129/6461) | 50% (3000/5996) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (627/1425) | 33% (309/933) |
| Return Points Won % | 41% (5704/14012) | 32% (4579/14327) |
| Slam W/L | 55% (23/19) | 29% (7/17) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (5/8) | 36% (5/9) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (16/25) | 39% (24/37) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (67/39) | 52% (92/84) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (14/2) | 72% (71/27) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (117/200) | 54% (192/355) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (8/18) | 38% (5/13) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 48% (37/77) | 50% (112/225) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 55% (33/60) | 53% (79/149) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (116/106) | 80% (191/152) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (116/10) | 20% (191/38) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (102/19) | 25% (183/45) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Robert VS Groth H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Volynets Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Hall of Fame Open – Newport – 12th July 2026 (Day 7)
-
Royer Vs Daniel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 10th July 2026 (Day 12)
-
Putintseva Vs Gibert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tomic Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Volynets Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Hall of Fame Open – Newport – 12th July 2026 (Day 7)
-
Royer Vs Daniel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 10th July 2026 (Day 12)
-
Putintseva Vs Gibert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tomic Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
