Shane Nicholls vs Filip Peliwo H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Nicholls VS Peliwo Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Shane Nicholls and Filip Peliwo stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 11-08-2014 in the Q2 round Round at the Canada F7, Peliwo got the win with 6-2 6-2. Nicholls stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Peliwo is no. 479.
Shane Nicholls
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Filip Peliwo
Ranking
479 ( 03-07-26)
Best Rank
161 ( 21-05-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
32 (19-05-1994)
Age
32 (30-01-1994)
Height
180
Weight
76
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Coach
Frederic Niemeyer
Turned Pro
2013
15% (4-22)
Career Total W/L
56% (485-379)
16% (4-21)
Career Hard W/L
57% (322-239)
0% (0-0)
Career Clay W/L
51% (58-56)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
29% (2-5)
0% (0-1)
Career Indoor W/L
57% (103-79)
$0
Career Prize Money
$50,555
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
42% (13-18)
Nicholls VS Peliwo H2H Matches played
|
Canada F7 | ||||||||
|
11 Aug 2014 Q2 |
6
2
6
2
|
||||||||
Nicholls VS Peliwo Head to head matches stats
| stats | Shane Nicholls | Filip Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Shane Nicholls past matches
Before:
|
Calgary Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Oct 2018 Q2 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Vincent Millot
Player
Shane Nicholls
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Winnipeg Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Jul 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Shane Nicholls
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Canada F5 (Saskatoon) | ||||||||
|
01 Jul 2018 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Canada F3 (Calgary) | ||||||||
|
18 Jun 2018 QF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Matt Seeberger
Player
Shane Nicholls
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
9
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
|
18 Jun 2018 Q2 |
5
7
7
5
1
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Filip Peliwo past matches
Before:
|
|
M15 Hillcrest | ||||||||
|
30 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Khololwam Montsi
Player
Filip Peliwo
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Vaasa | ||||||||
|
13 Jun 2026 SF |
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Filip Peliwo
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Jun 2026 QF |
3
6
6
3
7
5
|
W
|
Filip Peliwo
Player
Matt Ponchet
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
H2H | |||||
|
11 Jun 2026 R2 |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Filip Peliwo
Player
Rafael Ymer
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
51%
(
24 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
39
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
7
6
6
1
|
W
|
Filip Peliwo
Player
Kristjan Tamm
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nicholls VS Peliwo matches vs all opponents
| stats | Shane Nicholls | Filip Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 16% (4/21) | 57% (322/239) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 13% (7/45) | 56% (708/563) |
| Games Won/Lost | 30% (125/297) | 52% (6075/5546) |
| Hard W/L | 16% (4/21) | 57% (322/239) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.02 | 0.24 |
| Total Aces | 4 | 1378 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 | 0.25 |
| Total Double Faults | 15 | 1394 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:16:33 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 852.6 | 784.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (132/242) | 59% (17820/30448) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 48% (63/132) | 67% (11975/17820) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (45/110) | 48% (6052/12627) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (4/9) | 45% (1542/3422) |
| Return Points Won % | 28% (63/223) | 42% (12986/30844) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (3/8) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (1/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 41% (68/96) |
| Futures W/L | 18% (4/18) | 67% (250/124) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 13% (3/24) | 57% (312/547) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 54% (70/130) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 54% (86/158) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 85% (316/268) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 15% (316/47) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (23/1) | 21% (245/51) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Nicholls VS Peliwo H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
