Sameer Kumar vs Christopher Marquis H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Kumar VS Marquis Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Sameer Kumar and Christopher Marquis stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 20-07-2015 in the First Round at the USA F22, Kumar got the win with 6-2 6-2. Kumar stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Marquis is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1258 ( 12-06-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1046 ( 12-01-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Kumar VS Marquis H2H Matches played
|
|
USA F22 | ||||||||
|
20 Jul 2015 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
||||||||
Kumar VS Marquis Head to head matches stats
| stats | Sameer Kumar | Christopher Marquis |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sameer Kumar past matches
|
|
USA F25 (Laguna Niguel) | ||||||||
|
18 Sep 2018 QF |
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
17 Sep 2018 Q2 |
6
3
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
16 Sep 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
15 Sep 2018 Pre-Q |
6
1
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F24 (Claremont) | ||||||||
|
10 Sep 2018 Q2 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Christopher Marquis past matches
|
|
USA F6 (Palm Coast) | ||||||||
|
27 Jan 2018 Pre-Q |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Turkey F16 | ||||||||
|
18 Apr 2016 Q1 |
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Pune Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 Oct 2015 Q1 |
6
1
6
3
|
L
|
Suraj R Prabodh
Player
Christopher Marquis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bangalore Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 Oct 2015 QF |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Temur Ismailov
Player
Christopher Marquis
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
11
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2015 Q1 |
7
5
2
6
6
4
|
W
|
Christopher Marquis
Player
Vignesh Peranamallur-Chandrasekhar
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Kumar VS Marquis matches vs all opponents
| stats | Sameer Kumar | Christopher Marquis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 68% (25/12) | 41% (31/45) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 67% (52/26) | 41% (70/100) |
| Games Won/Lost | 59% (404/286) | 46% (718/831) |
| Hard W/L | 68% (25/12) | 41% (31/45) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 19 | 35 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Total Double Faults | 19 | 51 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 902.11 | 1107.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (334/513) | 57% (371/650) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (217/334) | 69% (256/371) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (90/179) | 41% (113/279) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 45% (24/53) | 40% (17/42) |
| Return Points Won % | 41% (209/512) | 32% (190/593) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 23% (3/10) |
| Futures W/L | 74% (25/9) | 44% (27/34) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (25/37) | 41% (30/73) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 60% (3/5) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) | 62% (13/21) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (24/23) | 81% (31/25) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (24/1) | 19% (31/6) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (13/2) | 13% (45/6) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Kumar VS Marquis H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Ruzic Vs Preston Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Jong Vs Baena Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 14th June 2026 (Day 7)
-
Sonmez Vs Klugman Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Vukic Vs Wendelken Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Hijikata Vs Giron Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Jong Vs Baena Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 14th June 2026 (Day 7)
-
Sonmez Vs Klugman Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Ruzic Vs Preston Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Vukic Vs Wendelken Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Hijikata Vs Giron Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 14th June 2026 (Day 0)
