Rodrigo Ramos Codes vs Quim Sorni Chavarria H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Codes VS Chavarria Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Rodrigo Ramos Codes and Quim Sorni Chavarria stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 10-10-2016 in the Q1 round Round at the Spain F33, Chavarria got the win with 6-1 6-0. Codes stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Chavarria is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1008 ( 27-11-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Codes VS Chavarria H2H Matches played
|
|
Spain F33 | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2016 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
||||||||
Codes VS Chavarria Head to head matches stats
| stats | Rodrigo Ramos Codes | Quim Sorni Chavarria |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 1 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Rodrigo Ramos Codes past matches
|
|
M15 Vero Beach 1 | ||||||||
|
25 Apr 2022 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Spain F30 (Madrid) | ||||||||
|
18 Sep 2017 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Spain F29 (Sevilla) | ||||||||
|
11 Sep 2017 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Portugal F18 (Sintra) | ||||||||
|
28 Aug 2017 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
28 Aug 2017 Q2 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Quim Sorni Chavarria past matches
|
|
Spain F29 (Sabadell) | ||||||||
|
27 Sep 2018 R2 |
6
1
2
6
6
2
|
L
|
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Quim Sorni Chavarria
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
81%
(
61 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 Sep 2018 R1 |
6
1
6
7
6
2
|
W
|
Quim Sorni Chavarria
Player
Marc Giner
79%
(
65 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 Sep 2018 QF |
6
2
2
6
6
4
|
L
|
Nikita Tatyanin
Player
Quim Sorni Chavarria
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
80)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Sep 2018 Q2 |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
22 Sep 2018 Q1 |
7
5
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Codes VS Chavarria matches vs all opponents
| stats | Rodrigo Ramos Codes | Quim Sorni Chavarria |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 61% (19/12) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 20% (2/8) | 60% (42/28) |
| Games Won/Lost | 31% (26/57) | 53% (333/299) |
| Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 61% (19/12) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.06 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 18 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.08 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 25 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 826.2 | 845.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (517/779) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (315/517) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 43% (113/262) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 35% (22/62) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 36% (247/683) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 20% (1/4) | 61% (19/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) | 61% (19/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Codes VS Chavarria H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
