Rishabdev Raman vs Mauricio Echazu H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Raman VS Echazu Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Rishabdev Raman and Mauricio Echazu stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 11-12-2019 in the First Round at the M15 Santo Domingo 3, Echazu got the win with 6-3 6-3. Raman stands at no. 1857 in the rankings, whilst Echazu is no. 896.
Rishabdev Raman
Ranking
1857 ( 25-06-26)
Best Rank
1748 ( 19-09-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Mauricio Echazu
Ranking
896 ( 25-06-26)
Best Rank
379 ( 08-02-10)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
33 (04-06-1993)
Age
37 (02-01-1989)
Height
Weight
Right-Handed
Plays
Two-Handed
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
26% (62-176)
Career Total W/L
56% (445-349)
26% (55-154)
Career Hard W/L
55% (153-124)
23% (5-17)
Career Clay W/L
57% (292-224)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
29% (2-5)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
30% (3-7)
YTD Win/Loss
71% (5-2)
Raman VS Echazu H2H Matches played
|
M15 Santo Domingo 3 | ||||||||
|
11 Dec 2019 R1 |
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Rishabdev Raman
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
Raman VS Echazu Head to head matches stats
| stats | Rishabdev Raman | Mauricio Echazu |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (32/53) | 71% (41/58) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 59% (19/32) | 76% (31/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) | 47% (8/17) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 25% (1/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Pts Won % | 33% (19/58) | 47% (25/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Rishabdev Raman past matches
Before:
|
|
M15 Harmon | ||||||||
|
01 Jun 2026 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Rishabdev Raman
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
31 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Nakhon Pathom | ||||||||
|
13 May 2026 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Markus Malaszszak
Player
Rishabdev Raman
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
H2H | |||||
|
11 May 2026 QF |
7
5
6
1
|
W
|
Rishabdev Raman
Player
Pannawat Suttisomboon
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
11
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 May 2026 Q1 |
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Mauricio Echazu past matches
Before:
|
|
M15 Brasilia | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Luis Felipe Miguel
Player
Mauricio Echazu
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
08 Jun 2026 QF |
6
3
6
0
|
W
|
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Andre Souza Pinto De Camargo
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
M15 Quito | ||||||||
|
30 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
3
2
6
6
2
|
L
|
Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios
Player
Mauricio Echazu
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
69
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
7
7
6
6
2
|
W
|
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Diego Giraldo
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
6
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
24%
(
23 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Raman VS Echazu matches vs all opponents
| stats | Rishabdev Raman | Mauricio Echazu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 26% (55/154) | 55% (153/124) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 30% (135/316) | 54% (337/291) |
| Games Won/Lost | 41% (1711/2416) | 52% (2980/2793) |
| Hard W/L | 26% (55/154) | 55% (153/124) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Total Aces | 32 | 124 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Total Double Faults | 111 | 201 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 499.03 | 1048.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (1019/1919) | 71% (3687/5228) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 56% (574/1019) | 64% (2349/3687) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (362/900) | 50% (766/1541) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 38% (58/153) | 45% (226/504) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (672/1826) | 40% (2035/5143) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 48% (14/15) |
| Futures W/L | 26% (55/154) | 56% (137/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 26% (55/208) | 56% (149/268) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 42% (11/26) | 58% (40/69) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 26% (9/34) | 56% (41/73) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (63/51) | 87% (150/131) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (63/12) | 12% (150/18) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (146/4) | 17% (127/21) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Raman VS Echazu H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Krueger Vs Hontama Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 24th June 2026 (Day -4)
-
Timofeeva Vs Podrez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 24th June 2026 (Day -4)
-
Wang Vs Ribera Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 24th June 2026 (Day -4)
-
Marcinko Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 24th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Muchova Vs Begu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 24th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Krueger Vs Hontama Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 24th June 2026 (Day -4)
-
Timofeeva Vs Podrez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 24th June 2026 (Day -4)
-
Wang Vs Ribera Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 24th June 2026 (Day -4)
-
Marcinko Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 24th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Muchova Vs Begu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 24th June 2026 (Day 3)
