Pete Sampras vs Alex Corretja H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Sampras VS Corretja Head to Head: 4 - 2
The H2H record between Pete Sampras and Alex Corretja stands at 4 - 2. In their last encounter on 05-04-2002 in the Quarterfinals Round at the Davis Cup, World Group, QF, USA-ESP 3-1, Sampras got the win with 4-6 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 6-4. Sampras stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Corretja is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1 ( 12-04-93)
Grand Slams
14
Masters
11
Main Tour
32
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
2 ( 01-02-99)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
2
Main Tour
14
Recent Form
4
2
1
0
2
0
1
1
0
1
Sampras VS Corretja H2H Matches played
|
|
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, USA-ESP 3-1 | ||||||||
|
05 Apr 2002 QF |
4
6
4
6
7
6
7
5
6
4
|
||||||||
|
|
Tennis Masters Cup - Lisbon | ||||||||
|
27 Nov 2000 Robin |
7
6
7
5
|
||||||||
|
|
Franklin Templeton Tennis Classic - Scottsdale | ||||||||
|
06 Mar 2000 R2 |
|
||||||||
|
|
ATP Tour World Championship - Hannover | ||||||||
|
23 Nov 1998 SF |
4
6
6
3
7
6
|
||||||||
|
|
U.S. Open | ||||||||
|
26 Aug 1996 QF |
7
6
5
7
5
7
6
4
7
6
|
||||||||
|
|
Indian Wells | ||||||||
|
11 Mar 1996 R2 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Rome | ||||||||
|
09 May 1994 R2 |
6
3
3
6
6
3
|
||||||||
|
|
Rome | ||||||||
|
10 May 1993 R2 |
6
4
7
5
|
||||||||
Sampras VS Corretja Head to head matches stats
| stats | Pete Sampras | Alex Corretja |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 4 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 12 | 8 |
| Games Won | 114 | 107 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Pete Sampras past matches
view more
Alex Corretja past matches
|
|
ECM Prague Open 2005 - Prague | ||||||||
|
09 May 2005 Q2 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
09 May 2005 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Estoril Open - Estoril | ||||||||
|
26 Apr 2005 R1 |
6
7
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Alex Corretja
58%
(
70 of
121)
1st Serve %
49%
(
58 of
119)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
120
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Open de la Comunidad Valenciana - Valencia | ||||||||
|
05 Apr 2005 R1 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Federico Luzzi
Player
Alex Corretja
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
86%
(
73 of
85)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tennis Napoli Cup - Napoli | ||||||||
|
30 Mar 2005 R2 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Sampras VS Corretja matches vs all opponents
| stats | Pete Sampras | Alex Corretja |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 80% (355/88) | 56% (110/86) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 73% (885/329) | 54% (285/244) |
| Games Won/Lost | 57% (6832/5157) | 51% (2627/2526) |
| Hard W/L | 80% (355/88) | 56% (110/86) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 12 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.01 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 21 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 889.34 | 875.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (254/432) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (166/254) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 48% (86/178) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 31% (11/35) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 35% (149/430) |
| Slam W/L | 87% (116/18) | 53% (23/20) |
| Masters W/L | 76% (126/40) | 54% (30/26) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 80% (111/28) | 59% (55/39) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 78% (233/300) | 57% (84/148) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 86% (122/142) | 56% (25/45) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 65% (129/199) | 56% (51/91) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 66% (84/127) | 57% (41/72) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (335/303) | 78% (111/87) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (335/32) | 22% (111/24) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 48% (108/52) | 27% (85/23) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Sampras VS Corretja H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
