Paul Capdeville vs Mao-Xin Gong H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Capdeville VS Gong Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Paul Capdeville and Mao-Xin Gong stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 20-07-2010 in the First Round at the Lexington Challenger, Capdeville got the win with 6-3 6-3. Capdeville stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Gong is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
76 ( 18-05-09)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
294 ( 31-01-11)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Capdeville VS Gong H2H Matches played
|
|
Lexington Challenger | ||||||||
|
20 Jul 2010 R1 |
6
3
6
3
|
||||||||
Capdeville VS Gong Head to head matches stats
| stats | Paul Capdeville | Mao-Xin Gong |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Paul Capdeville past matches
|
|
Santiago Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Apr 2014 R2 |
6
7
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
James Duckworth
Player
Paul Capdeville
40%
(
46 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
15
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
40 of
69)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Apr 2014 R1 |
6
1
6
0
|
W
|
Paul Capdeville
Player
Guillermo Nunez
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
43%
(
15 of
35)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Barranquilla Challenger | ||||||||
|
26 Mar 2014 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Adrian Ungur
Player
Paul Capdeville
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Panama City Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 Mar 2014 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Paul Capdeville
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
09 Jan 2014 Q2 |
6
0
6
4
|
L
|
Taro Daniel
Player
Paul Capdeville
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Mao-Xin Gong past matches
|
|
Chengdu Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Jul 2019 R2 |
7
6
6
1
|
L
|
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 Jul 2019 R1 |
3
6
7
6
7
6
|
W
|
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Min-Kyu Song
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
10
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
6
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bangkok Challenger | ||||||||
|
07 Jan 2018 Q2 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Lukas Ollert
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Jan 2018 Q1 |
4
6
6
3
6
1
|
W
|
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Worarin Kumthonkittikul
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
38%
(
33 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Suzhou Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2017 Q1 |
7
6
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Capdeville VS Gong matches vs all opponents
| stats | Paul Capdeville | Mao-Xin Gong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (137/95) | 57% (185/140) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (324/243) | 54% (403/342) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (2774/2579) | 52% (3566/3280) |
| Hard W/L | 59% (137/95) | 57% (185/140) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.24 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 631 | 158 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Total Double Faults | 408 | 251 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 992.78 | 1013.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (6322/10276) | 60% (2716/4515) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (4410/6322) | 64% (1730/2716) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1934/3954) | 47% (842/1799) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (426/1041) | 44% (162/366) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (4086/10520) | 37% (1624/4387) |
| Slam W/L | 61% (25/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 51% (18/17) | 0% (0/6) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 51% (26/25) | 14% (1/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 66% (63/33) | 50% (49/49) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 63% (135/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (129/214) | 56% (177/314) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (7/17) | 33% (1/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 53% (41/77) | 45% (37/83) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 51% (40/79) | 61% (61/100) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (134/112) | 88% (173/153) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (134/22) | 11% (173/19) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (98/25) | 20% (152/31) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Capdeville VS Gong H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Jacquet Vs Trungelliti Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Lajovic Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Yaneva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA ATV Bancomat Tennis Open – Rome – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Okamura Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Morvayova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Jacquet Vs Trungelliti Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Lajovic Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Yaneva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA ATV Bancomat Tennis Open – Rome – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Okamura Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Morvayova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
