Matteo Arnaldi vs Botic Van De Zandschulp H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Arnaldi VS Zandschulp Head to Head: 0 - 3
The H2H record between Matteo Arnaldi and Botic Van De Zandschulp stands at 0 - 3. In their last encounter on 19-08-2025 in the Second Round at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, Zandschulp got the win with 6-3 6-3. Arnaldi stands at no. 34 in the rankings, whilst Zandschulp is no. 56.
Matteo Arnaldi
Ranking
34 ( 19-06-26)
Best Rank
30 ( 12-08-24)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranking
56 ( 19-06-26)
Best Rank
22 ( 29-08-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
0
Total
3
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
1
0
Grass
1
25 (22-02-2001)
Age
30 (04-10-1995)
185
Height
191
71
Weight
85
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Alessandro Petrone, Matteo Civarolo
Coach
Peter Lucassen, Fred Hemmes
2019
Turned Pro
2016
60% (253-169)
Career Total W/L
60% (395-260)
60% (86-58)
Career Hard W/L
57% (78-59)
66% (145-76)
Career Clay W/L
61% (184-116)
40% (4-6)
Career Grass W/L
43% (13-17)
38% (18-29)
Career Indoor W/L
64% (120-68)
$3,353,990
Career Prize Money
$4,275,720
61% (14-9)
YTD Win/Loss
48% (13-14)
Arnaldi VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
|
Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem | ||||||||
|
19 Aug 2025 R2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
|
Wimbledon - London | ||||||||
|
01 Jul 2025 R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
73 of
121)
1st Serve %
50%
(
68 of
136)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
53 of
68)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
34 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
48 of
136)
135
Total Points Won
122
|
7
6
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
|
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA-NED 2-1 | ||||||||
|
23 Nov 2023 Rubber 1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
121)
14
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
53 of
78)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
28 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
121
Total Points Won
105
|
6
7
6
3
7
6
|
|||||||
Arnaldi VS Zandschulp Head to head matches stats
| stats | Matteo Arnaldi | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 7 |
| Games Won | 38 | 51 |
| Total Aces | 21 | 22 |
| Total Double Faults | 11 | 12 |
| Average Match Time | 2:27:49 | 2:27:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (184/331) | 62% (169/273) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (131/184) | 81% (137/169) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (73/147) | 61% (63/104) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 20% (2/10) | 32% (7/22) |
| Return Pts Won % | 27% (73/273) | 38% (127/331) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Matteo Arnaldi past matches
Before:
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
05 Jun 2026 SF |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
03 Jun 2026 QF |
7
5
5
2
|
W
|
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Matteo Berrettini
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
01 Jun 2026 R4 |
7
6
6
7
3
6
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Frances Tiafoe
65%
(
139 of
214)
1st Serve %
55%
(
110 of
199)
18
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
65%
(
91 of
139)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
68 of
110)
44%
(
33 of
75)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
90 of
214)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
87 of
199)
211
Total Points Won
202
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 May 2026 R3 |
6
4
6
7
5
7
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Raphael Collignon
62%
(
113 of
181)
1st Serve %
67%
(
130 of
193)
14
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
10
76%
(
86 of
113)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
97 of
130)
53%
(
36 of
68)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
33%
(
59 of
181)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
67 of
193)
189
Total Points Won
185
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2026 R2 |
7
6
5
7
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
60%
(
77 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
117)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
117)
129
Total Points Won
116
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp past matches
Before:
|
|
HSBC Championships - London | ||||||||
|
18 Jun 2026 R2 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Tommy Paul
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Harry Wendelken
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
8
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
92 of
152)
1st Serve %
59%
(
93 of
157)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
64 of
93)
48%
(
29 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
60 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
66 of
157)
158
Total Points Won
151
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bordeaux Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
2
0
|
L
|
Quentin Halys
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Arnaldi VS Zandschulp matches vs all opponents
| stats | Matteo Arnaldi | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 60% (86/58) | 57% (78/59) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (205/152) | 53% (185/167) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (1795/1623) | 51% (1752/1684) |
| Hard W/L | 60% (86/58) | 57% (78/59) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.42 | 0.51 |
| Total Aces | 706 | 853 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 | 0.35 |
| Total Double Faults | 430 | 594 |
| Average Match Time | 1:46:23 | 1:56:59 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 345.28 | 162.09 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (5958/10290) | 62% (6601/10720) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (4166/5958) | 72% (4767/6601) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2174/4332) | 47% (1956/4119) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (383/929) | 43% (408/949) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (3889/10038) | 38% (4215/10964) |
| Slam W/L | 56% (10/8) | 61% (19/12) |
| Masters W/L | 54% (20/17) | 48% (15/16) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 47% (16/18) | 57% (33/25) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 72% (13/5) | 64% (7/4) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (27/10) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (80/132) | 57% (64/112) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) | 52% (12/23) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 60% (26/43) | 56% (31/55) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 52% (28/54) | 64% (30/47) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (87/73) | 87% (67/58) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (87/14) | 13% (67/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (57/13) | 29% (70/20) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Arnaldi VS Zandschulp H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Altmaier Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Bouzkova Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Cecchinato Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Parma Challenger – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Altmaier Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Bouzkova Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Cecchinato Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Parma Challenger – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
