Mathieu Roy vs Milos Sekulic H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Roy VS Sekulic Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Mathieu Roy and Milos Sekulic stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 10-09-2012 in the First Round at the Sweden F4, Roy got the win with 4-6 7-6(12) 6-4. Roy stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Sekulic is no. Ret..
Mathieu Roy
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
728 ( 05-08-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Milos Sekulic
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
643 ( 25-08-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
36 (22-09-1989)
Age
36 (04-11-1989)
Height
178
Weight
73
Plays
Right-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Coach
Turned Pro
2008
48% (150-162)
Career Total W/L
50% (178-178)
51% (72-70)
Career Hard W/L
53% (51-45)
29% (10-25)
Career Clay W/L
46% (72-83)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
50% (68-67)
Career Indoor W/L
52% (55-50)
$0
Career Prize Money
$7,975
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Roy VS Sekulic H2H Matches played
|
Sweden F4 | ||||||||
|
10 Sep 2012 R1 |
4
6
7
6
6
4
|
||||||||
Roy VS Sekulic Head to head matches stats
| stats | Mathieu Roy | Milos Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 16 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Mathieu Roy past matches
Before:
|
|
France F21 (Saint-Dizier) | ||||||||
|
07 Oct 2018 QF |
2
6
7
6
6
2
|
L
|
Ronan Joncour
Player
Mathieu Roy
80%
(
72 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Oct 2018 Q1 |
6
1
6
1
|
W
|
Mathieu Roy
Player
Herve Antchandie
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
H2H | |||||
|
France F19 (Sarreguemines) | ||||||||
|
24 Sep 2018 R1 |
6
2
3
6
6
2
|
L
|
Michael Geerts
Player
Mathieu Roy
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
France F6 (Villers Les Nancy) | ||||||||
|
21 Mar 2018 R2 |
3
6
7
6
6
2
|
L
|
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Mathieu Roy
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
H2H | |||||
|
19 Mar 2018 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Mathieu Roy
Player
Christian Hirschmueller
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Milos Sekulic past matches
Before:
|
Sweden F3 (Lund) | ||||||||
|
22 May 2018 R1 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Milos Sekulic
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 May 2018 QF |
6
1
6
1
|
W
|
Milos Sekulic
Player
Rikard Roos
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
19 May 2018 Q1 |
6
1
7
6
|
W
|
Milos Sekulic
Player
Daniel Svensson
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
Egypt F10 (Sharm El Sheikh) | ||||||||
|
19 Mar 2018 QF |
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
18 Mar 2018 Q2 |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Roy VS Sekulic matches vs all opponents
| stats | Mathieu Roy | Milos Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 51% (72/70) | 53% (51/45) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 51% (158/154) | 53% (117/102) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (1413/1373) | 52% (1032/948) |
| Hard W/L | 51% (72/70) | 53% (51/45) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Total Aces | 44 | 26 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Total Double Faults | 46 | 29 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1143.31 | 1101.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (663/1054) | 55% (393/719) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 61% (404/663) | 59% (230/393) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (173/391) | 47% (152/326) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 53% (56/106) | 44% (31/70) |
| Return Points Won % | 43% (453/1055) | 40% (273/691) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (65/65) | 53% (50/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (68/136) | 54% (51/94) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 63% (15/24) | 52% (13/25) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 47% (14/30) | 48% (13/27) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (75/64) | 78% (55/43) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (75/11) | 22% (55/12) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (67/6) | 20% (41/8) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Roy VS Sekulic H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Yastremska Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Yastremska Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Atmane Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
