Marcelo Charpentier vs James Lemke H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Charpentier VS Lemke Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Marcelo Charpentier and James Lemke stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 09-07-2007 in the Second Round at the Italy F22, Charpentier got the win with 6-1 6-2. Charpentier stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Lemke is no. Ret..
Marcelo Charpentier
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
114 ( 16-06-97)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
James Lemke
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
224 ( 06-06-11)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
52 (11-07-1973)
Age
38 (25-01-1988)
180
Height
75
Weight
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Unknown
Backhand
Unknown
Coach
1992
Turned Pro
57% (159-120)
Career Total W/L
59% (203-144)
33% (3-6)
Career Hard W/L
53% (58-52)
59% (149-105)
Career Clay W/L
62% (132-82)
0% (0-3)
Career Grass W/L
69% (11-5)
54% (7-6)
Career Indoor W/L
29% (2-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$4,225
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Charpentier VS Lemke H2H Matches played
|
Italy F22 | ||||||||
|
09 Jul 2007 R2 |
6
1
6
2
|
||||||||
Charpentier VS Lemke Head to head matches stats
| stats | Marcelo Charpentier | James Lemke |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Marcelo Charpentier past matches
Before:
view more
James Lemke past matches
Before:
|
|
Australia F5 | ||||||||
|
07 Apr 2014 R2 |
7
5
2
6
11
9
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
07 Apr 2014 R1 |
6
4
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
Melbourne Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Oct 2013 R1 |
6
4
6
0
|
L
|
Yuki Bhambri
Player
James Lemke
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
|
21 Oct 2013 QF |
7
5
6
1
|
W
|
James Lemke
Player
Jacob Grills
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 Oct 2013 Q2 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
James Lemke
Player
Sam Dowler
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Charpentier VS Lemke matches vs all opponents
| stats | Marcelo Charpentier | James Lemke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 53% (58/52) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 33% (7/14) | 51% (129/123) |
| Games Won/Lost | 47% (96/110) | 51% (1160/1104) |
| Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) | 53% (58/52) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.02 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 20 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.08 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 83 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 746.11 | 1188.84 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (994/1419) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (619/994) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 47% (200/425) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 50% (64/129) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 40% (530/1341) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 45% (14/17) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (41/29) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) | 52% (56/108) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 33% (1/3) | 55% (12/22) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) | 56% (18/32) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) | 88% (57/50) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) | 12% (57/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (6/1) | 15% (53/8) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Charpentier VS Lemke H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Nava Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Nava Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Zarazua Vs Akli Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W100 Bonita Springs – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Sonego Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Sonego Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Nava Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Nava Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Zarazua Vs Akli Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W100 Bonita Springs – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Sonego Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Sonego Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cagliari Challenger – 29th April 2026 (Day 3)
