Liam Hignett vs Jonathan Binding H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Hignett VS Binding Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Liam Hignett and Jonathan Binding stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 16-09-2018 in the Q1 round Round at the Great Britain F5 (Roehampton), Binding got the win with 6-3 7-6(6). Hignett stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Binding is no. Ret..
Liam Hignett
Ranking
- ( 08-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Jonathan Binding
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
985 ( 05-08-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
26 (06-12-1999)
Age
33 (13-03-1993)
183
Height
185
88
Weight
82
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
One-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Coach
Adam Barratclough
Turned Pro
38% (33-53)
Career Total W/L
53% (85-75)
39% (14-22)
Career Hard W/L
56% (52-41)
0% (0-1)
Career Clay W/L
50% (1-1)
25% (2-6)
Career Grass W/L
50% (2-2)
41% (17-24)
Career Indoor W/L
49% (30-31)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
53% (8-7)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Hignett VS Binding H2H Matches played
|
Great Britain F5 (Roehampton) | ||||||||
|
16 Sep 2018 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
||||||||
Hignett VS Binding Head to head matches stats
| stats | Liam Hignett | Jonathan Binding |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Liam Hignett past matches
Before:
|
Nottingham 3 Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 Jul 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Michael Zhu
Player
Liam Hignett
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Figueira da Foz | ||||||||
|
29 Jun 2026 QF |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Nikola Djukic Valera
Player
Liam Hignett
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Bakio | ||||||||
|
23 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Roberto Perez Socas
Player
Liam Hignett
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Jun 2026 QF |
6
1
7
5
|
W
|
Liam Hignett
Player
Marc Ros Mesas
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jonathan Binding past matches
Before:
|
|
M25 Roehampton 1 | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2022 QF |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Jul 2022 Q1 |
6
4
6
0
|
W
|
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 New Delhi 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Mar 2021 Q2 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
28 Mar 2021 Q1 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Pune 1 | ||||||||
|
21 Mar 2021 Q1 |
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hignett VS Binding matches vs all opponents
| stats | Liam Hignett | Jonathan Binding |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 39% (14/22) | 56% (52/41) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 41% (33/48) | 56% (121/94) |
| Games Won/Lost | 48% (381/421) | 53% (1069/959) |
| Hard W/L | 39% (14/22) | 56% (52/41) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.28 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 110 | 51 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| Total Double Faults | 82 | 122 |
| Average Match Time | 1:20:15 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 479.92 | 875.98 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1122/1926) | 61% (817/1348) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 64% (721/1122) | 67% (546/817) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (377/804) | 45% (238/531) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (74/169) | 44% (48/110) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (730/1898) | 38% (492/1280) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 39% (14/22) | 56% (52/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (14/36) | 56% (52/93) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (4/8) | 62% (16/26) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) | 41% (12/29) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (14/12) | 82% (55/45) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (14/2) | 18% (55/10) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (22/2) | 18% (38/7) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Hignett VS Binding H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
