Kenneth Carlsen vs Milen Velev H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Carlsen VS Velev Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Kenneth Carlsen and Milen Velev stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 18-10-1993 in the First Round at the Vienna, Carlsen got the win with 4-6 7-5 6-1. Carlsen stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Velev is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
41 ( 07-06-93)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
3
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
121 ( 27-09-93)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Carlsen VS Velev H2H Matches played
|
|
Vienna | ||||||||
|
18 Oct 1993 R1 |
4
6
7
5
6
1
|
||||||||
Carlsen VS Velev Head to head matches stats
| stats | Kenneth Carlsen | Milen Velev |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Kenneth Carlsen past matches
|
|
Kobstaedernes ATP Challenger - Kolding | ||||||||
|
17 Oct 2007 R1 |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Stockholm Open - Stockholm | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2007 R1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Michael Ryderstedt
Player
Kenneth Carlsen
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
16 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Oct 2007 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Filip Prpic
Player
Kenneth Carlsen
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Oct 2007 Q1 |
6
3
5
7
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Open de Moselle - Metz | ||||||||
|
29 Sep 2007 Q1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Roman Valent
Player
Kenneth Carlsen
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Milen Velev past matches
|
|
Hungarian Open - Budapest | ||||||||
|
20 May 2002 Q1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
ECM Cup - Prague | ||||||||
|
13 May 2002 Q1 |
4
6
6
1
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Gemax Open 2002 - Belgrade | ||||||||
|
04 Feb 2002 Q1 |
4
6
6
1
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
DPD Challenger 2001 - Aschaffenburg | ||||||||
|
03 Sep 2001 Q2 |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
03 Sep 2001 QF |
6
4
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Carlsen VS Velev matches vs all opponents
| stats | Kenneth Carlsen | Milen Velev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 51% (153/149) | 0% (0/4) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 49% (372/380) | 18% (2/9) |
| Games Won/Lost | 50% (3728/3729) | 27% (23/63) |
| Hard W/L | 51% (153/149) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.07 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 241 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 87 | 0 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 949.55 | 1048.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1589/2654) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 74% (1127/1529) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (496/1025) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (73/198) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Won % | 35% (824/2326) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 39% (17/27) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 45% (14/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 53% (101/90) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (17/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (138/262) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (13/37) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 47% (64/135) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 55% (52/94) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (149/121) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (149/27) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (153/30) | 0% (3/0) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Carlsen VS Velev H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Sabalenka Vs Shnaider Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 3rd June 2026 (Day 10)
-
Shevchenko Vs Sanchez-Izquierdo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Perugia Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Topo Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Marcinko Vs Hennemann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Sabalenka Vs Shnaider Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA French Open – Paris – 3rd June 2026 (Day 10)
-
Shevchenko Vs Sanchez-Izquierdo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Perugia Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Topo Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Marcinko Vs Hennemann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 3rd June 2026 (Day 3)
