Jimmy Wang vs Peter Luczak H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Wang VS Luczak Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Jimmy Wang and Peter Luczak stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 20-09-2004 in the First Round at the China Open - Beijing, Luczak got the win with 7-6(5) 6-2. Wang stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Luczak is no. Ret..
Jimmy Wang
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
85 ( 06-03-06)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Peter Luczak
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
64 ( 12-10-09)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
1
Total
1
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
1
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
41 (08-02-1985)
Age
46 (31-08-1979)
180
Height
183
73
Weight
77
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Dejan Petrovic & Vahe Assadourian
Coach
Josh Eagle, Todd Woodbridge
2001
Turned Pro
2000
58% (399-288)
Career Total W/L
55% (370-298)
60% (266-180)
Career Hard W/L
50% (108-110)
29% (6-15)
Career Clay W/L
60% (219-143)
59% (41-28)
Career Grass W/L
42% (11-15)
57% (86-65)
Career Indoor W/L
52% (32-30)
$432,458
Career Prize Money
$303,620
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Wang VS Luczak H2H Matches played
|
China Open - Beijing | ||||||||
|
20 Sep 2004 R1 |
7
6
6
2
|
||||||||
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
24 May 2004 Q1 |
Peter Luczak
Player
Jimmy Wang
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6
1
6
3
|
|||||||
Wang VS Luczak Head to head matches stats
| stats | Jimmy Wang | Peter Luczak |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 20 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (27/42) | 65% (36/55) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) | 64% (23/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 7% (1/15) | 37% (7/19) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (3/6) | 88% (7/8) |
| Return Pts Won % | 45% (25/55) | 71% (30/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jimmy Wang past matches
Before:
|
Taipei City Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Apr 2018 Q2 |
4
6
7
6
|
L
|
Ray Ho
Player
Jimmy Wang
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Apr 2018 Q1 |
6
3
6
1
|
W
|
Jimmy Wang
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Zhangjiagang Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Sep 2017 Q1 |
2
6
6
3
|
L
|
Jui-Chen Hung
Player
Jimmy Wang
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
10 of
40)
46
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Taipei City Challenger | ||||||||
|
20 Apr 2017 R2 |
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
Yen-Hsun Lu
Player
Jimmy Wang
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
18 Apr 2017 R1 |
4
6
6
4
|
W
|
Jimmy Wang
Player
Alexander Kudryavtsev
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Peter Luczak past matches
Before:
|
|
SkiStar Swedish Open - Bastad | ||||||||
|
19 Jul 2015 Q2 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Paul-Henri Mathieu
Player
Peter Luczak
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
18 Jul 2015 Q1 |
6
3
6
7
6
3
|
W
|
Peter Luczak
Player
Stefan Lindmark
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
9
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai | ||||||||
|
06 Oct 2012 Q1 |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
13 Jan 2012 Q2 |
6
2
7
5
|
L
|
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Peter Luczak
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
7
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
11 Jan 2012 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
W
|
Peter Luczak
Player
Dominik Meffert
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Wang VS Luczak matches vs all opponents
| stats | Jimmy Wang | Peter Luczak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 60% (266/180) | 50% (108/110) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 58% (601/441) | 50% (275/276) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (5162/4484) | 50% (2735/2687) |
| Hard W/L | 60% (266/180) | 50% (108/110) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Total Aces | 611 | 421 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 | 0.07 |
| Total Double Faults | 490 | 176 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 970.39 | 1006.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8037/13538) | 64% (3667/5692) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5436/8037) | 70% (2549/3628) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2805/5494) | 52% (1048/2014) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (645/1460) | 39% (169/429) |
| Return Points Won % | 42% (5563/13361) | 35% (1909/5435) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (18/18) | 46% (19/22) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (4/8) | 37% (7/12) |
| Cups W/L | 73% (8/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (15/24) | 49% (33/35) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (184/115) | 56% (47/37) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (37/12) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (253/415) | 51% (101/198) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (11/23) | 32% (6/19) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (62/123) | 48% (49/102) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (73/129) | 47% (39/83) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (249/219) | 75% (113/85) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (249/29) | 24% (113/27) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (196/47) | 21% (105/22) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Wang VS Luczak H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Jong Vs Milic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Altmaier Vs Tiafoe Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Boss Open – Stuttgart – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Naef Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shymanovich Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korpatsch Vs Ruse Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Jong Vs Milic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Altmaier Vs Tiafoe Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Boss Open – Stuttgart – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Naef Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shymanovich Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korpatsch Vs Ruse Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
