Jeff Dadamo vs Jeremy Efferding H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Dadamo VS Efferding Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Jeff Dadamo and Jeremy Efferding stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 21-07-2014 in the Second Round at the USA F21, Dadamo got the win with 6-2 6-2. Dadamo stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Efferding is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
480 ( 15-10-12)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
985 ( 12-08-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dadamo VS Efferding H2H Matches played
|
|
USA F21 | ||||||||
|
21 Jul 2014 R2 |
6
2
6
2
|
||||||||
Dadamo VS Efferding Head to head matches stats
| stats | Jeff Dadamo | Jeremy Efferding |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jeff Dadamo past matches
view more
Jeremy Efferding past matches
|
|
Lexington Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Jul 2016 Q1 |
4
6
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
Jeremy Efferding
49%
(
45 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
6
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F22 | ||||||||
|
30 Jun 2016 R2 |
7
5
3
6
6
3
|
L
|
Connor Smith
Player
Jeremy Efferding
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Jun 2016 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Jeremy Efferding
Player
Robert Galloway
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F20 | ||||||||
|
22 Jun 2016 R1 |
6
3
3
6
5
3
|
L
|
Nathan Pasha
Player
Jeremy Efferding
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 Jun 2016 QF |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Dadamo VS Efferding matches vs all opponents
| stats | Jeff Dadamo | Jeremy Efferding |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 60% (73/48) | 64% (30/17) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (164/115) | 62% (63/39) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (1434/1245) | 56% (518/403) |
| Hard W/L | 60% (73/48) | 64% (30/17) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.21 | 0.11 |
| Total Aces | 269 | 49 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Total Double Faults | 165 | 23 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1065.96 | 938.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1691/2938) | 66% (743/1126) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (1213/1691) | 66% (494/743) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (643/1247) | 52% (199/383) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (111/299) | 35% (34/97) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (1114/2883) | 36% (409/1149) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (21/15) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (50/29) | 67% (29/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (73/121) | 65% (30/46) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 48% (24/50) | 64% (9/14) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 51% (19/37) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (74/65) | 91% (32/29) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (74/9) | 9% (32/3) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (47/8) | 7% (15/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Dadamo VS Efferding H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Nahimana Vs Udvardy Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Zhang Vs Parry Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Collignon Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Gonet Geneva Open – Geneva – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Buse Vs Mensik Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Humbert Vs Khachanov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Nahimana Vs Udvardy Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Zhang Vs Parry Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Collignon Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Gonet Geneva Open – Geneva – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Buse Vs Mensik Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Humbert Vs Khachanov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)