Jan Minar vs Daniel Cox H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Minar VS Cox Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Jan Minar and Daniel Cox stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 17-10-2011 in the Semifinals Round at the Great Britain F16, Minar got the win with 6-3 1-6 6-3. Minar stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Cox is no. 874.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
177 ( 05-05-08)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
874 ( 01-07-26)
Best Rank
206 ( 28-07-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Minar VS Cox H2H Matches played
|
|
Great Britain F16 | ||||||||
|
17 Oct 2011 SF |
6
3
1
6
6
3
|
||||||||
Minar VS Cox Head to head matches stats
| stats | Jan Minar | Daniel Cox |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jan Minar past matches
|
|
Czech Republic F11 | ||||||||
|
29 Nov 2016 R1 |
2
6
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Jan Minar
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Czech Republic F10 | ||||||||
|
24 Nov 2016 QF |
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
Marek Jaloviec
Player
Jan Minar
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Nov 2016 R2 |
7
6
6
7
6
0
|
W
|
Jan Minar
Player
Dominik Boehler
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Nov 2016 R1 |
3
6
6
3
7
5
|
W
|
Jan Minar
Player
Daniel Lustig
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Czech Republic F8 | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2016 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Marek Gengel
Player
Jan Minar
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Daniel Cox past matches
|
|
M25 Nottingham 2 | ||||||||
|
03 May 2024 QF |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
02 May 2024 R2 |
7
6
7
6
|
W
|
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 Apr 2024 R1 |
6
0
6
3
|
W
|
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Nottingham 1 | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2024 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Glasgow Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Feb 2024 R2 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Minar VS Cox matches vs all opponents
| stats | Jan Minar | Daniel Cox |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (46/41) | 67% (235/117) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (106/95) | 62% (495/306) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (978/944) | 55% (4062/3321) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (46/41) | 67% (235/117) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Total Aces | 88 | 447 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 | 0.12 |
| Total Double Faults | 78 | 433 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1055.9 | 971.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1255/1911) | 60% (5054/8441) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (835/1255) | 69% (3462/5054) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (331/656) | 47% (1605/3387) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 36% (63/175) | 42% (402/962) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (688/1862) | 41% (3482/8431) |
| Slam W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (21/23) | 49% (36/37) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (16/4) | 72% (199/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (46/84) | 66% (228/345) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 46% (12/26) | 60% (47/78) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 54% (15/28) | 70% (69/98) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (47/38) | 93% (204/189) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (47/9) | 7% (204/15) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (40/9) | 30% (148/45) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Minar VS Cox H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Lehecka Vs Popyrin Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Kudermetova Vs Samsonova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shnaider Vs Lys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Altmaier Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Blockx Vs Zverev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Kudermetova Vs Samsonova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lehecka Vs Popyrin Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shnaider Vs Lys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Altmaier Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Blockx Vs Zverev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
