James Davis vs Strong Kirchheimer H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Davis VS Kirchheimer Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between James Davis and Strong Kirchheimer stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 16-03-2023 in the Second Round at the M25 Montreal 2, Kirchheimer got the win with 6-1 6-3. Davis stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Kirchheimer is no. 649.
James Davis
Ranking
- ( 05-06-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Strong Kirchheimer
Ranking
649 ( 05-06-26)
Best Rank
375 ( 06-11-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
1
0
Grass
0
27 (10-12-1998)
Age
31 (26-04-1995)
188
Height
185
85
Weight
79
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Unknown
Rob Morgan, George Morgan
Coach
Robert Kirchheimer, Arvid Swan
Turned Pro
54% (52-45)
Career Total W/L
54% (328-285)
59% (27-19)
Career Hard W/L
53% (175-155)
0% (0-0)
Career Clay W/L
54% (81-68)
33% (1-2)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
50% (24-24)
Career Indoor W/L
54% (72-62)
$0
Career Prize Money
$8,150
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
48% (10-11)
Davis VS Kirchheimer H2H Matches played
|
M25 Montreal 2 | ||||||||
|
16 Mar 2023 R2 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
James Davis
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6
1
6
3
|
|||||||
Davis VS Kirchheimer Head to head matches stats
| stats | James Davis | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (31/45) | 60% (27/45) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) | 85% (23/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7/14) | 61% (11/18) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/3) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Pts Won % | 24% (11/45) | 47% (21/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
James Davis past matches
Before:
|
M15 Monastir 15 | ||||||||
|
07 Apr 2024 Q1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Torello 1 | ||||||||
|
05 Mar 2024 QF |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
04 Mar 2024 Q2 |
6
2
7
5
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
03 Mar 2024 Q1 |
6
1
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Villena 2 | ||||||||
|
25 Feb 2024 Q1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Strong Kirchheimer past matches
Before:
|
M15 Vero Beach | ||||||||
|
06 May 2026 R1 |
3
6
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Apr 2026 Q1 |
7
6
1
6
6
2
|
L
|
Braden Shick
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tallahassee Challenger | ||||||||
|
12 Apr 2026 Q1 |
6
0
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sarasota Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Daniil Glinka
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Apr 2026 R1 |
4
6
7
5
7
6
|
W
|
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Faurel
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
84%
(
85 of
101)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Davis VS Kirchheimer matches vs all opponents
| stats | James Davis | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (27/19) | 53% (175/155) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (57/43) | 54% (413/354) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (525/440) | 52% (3825/3524) |
| Hard W/L | 59% (27/19) | 53% (175/155) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.16 | 0.31 |
| Total Aces | 74 | 1098 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| Total Double Faults | 51 | 626 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:30:21 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 480.52 | 669.02 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (796/1276) | 64% (11931/18652) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (545/796) | 69% (8237/11931) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (237/480) | 52% (3521/6721) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (48/121) | 38% (698/1859) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (457/1171) | 38% (7365/19168) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (48/66) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (27/19) | 60% (123/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (27/46) | 53% (172/323) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 44% (4/9) | 47% (48/102) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) | 42% (45/108) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (26/25) | 79% (191/150) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (26/1) | 21% (191/40) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (20/2) | 18% (139/25) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Davis VS Kirchheimer H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
