Head to head career and match stats comparison between Kim vs Foster-Estwick. For active players who have an upcoming match between them we will show our machine learning H2H prediction here for Kim, Foster-Estwick.
Ranking
794 ( 28-03-24)
Best Rank
794 ( 24-12-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Others
0
Recent Form
Ranking
- ( 28-03-24)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Others
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
Kim VS Foster-Estwick Head to head matches stats
stats | Jae Hwan Kim | Matthew Foster-Estwick |
---|---|---|
H2H All Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
Total DFs | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total BPs Won% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total TBs W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kim VS Foster-Estwick H2h Matches played
M15 Monastir | |||||||||
04 Apr 2022 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
Kim VS Foster-Estwick matches vs all opponents
stats | Jae Hwan Kim | Matthew Foster-Estwick |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces Per Game | 0 | 0 |
Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
Total DFs | 0 | 0 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total BPs Won% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Total TBs W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jae Hwan Kim past matches
M25 Anseong | |||||||||
21 Jun 2023 R1 |
J. H. Kim
WC
|
6
1
6
3
|
L
|
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | ||||
M25 Changwon | |||||||||
14 Jun 2023 R1 |
J. Na
q
J. H. Kim
WC
|
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
H2H |
view more
Matthew Foster-Estwick past matches
M15 Tacarigua | |||||||||
20 Apr 2023 R2 |
6
3
1
1
|
L
|
Amaury Raynel
Player
Matthew Foster-Estwick
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40
Total Points Won
33
|
H2H | |||||
19 Apr 2023 R1 |
6
4
1
6
6
4
|
W
|
Matthew Foster-Estwick
Player
Jesse Flores
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H |
view more