Ivo Minar vs Matwe Middelkoop H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Minar VS Middelkoop Head to Head: 2 - 1
The H2H record between Ivo Minar and Matwe Middelkoop stands at 2 - 1. In their last encounter on 21-10-2013 in the Semifinals Round at the Turkey F42, Minar got the win with 7-5 6-4. Minar stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Middelkoop is no. Ret..
Ivo Minar
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
62 ( 20-07-09)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Matwe Middelkoop
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
197 ( 03-11-08)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
2
Total
1
0
Hard
1
1
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
41 (21-05-1984)
Age
42 (03-09-1983)
183
Height
191
85
Weight
85
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Unknown
Backhand
Two-Handed
Karol Dusan
Coach
Willem-Jan van Hulst, Gerard van Hellemondt
2002
Turned Pro
2002
55% (379-315)
Career Total W/L
58% (418-303)
59% (93-64)
Career Hard W/L
56% (77-61)
58% (229-169)
Career Clay W/L
61% (256-161)
38% (10-16)
Career Grass W/L
22% (2-7)
42% (47-66)
Career Indoor W/L
53% (83-74)
$371,465
Career Prize Money
$46,533
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Minar VS Middelkoop H2H Matches played
|
Turkey F42 | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2013 SF |
7
5
6
4
|
||||||||
|
Sofia Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Apr 2009 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
||||||||
|
Challenger Groningen - Groningen | ||||||||
|
26 Nov 2004 QF |
6
2
6
1
|
||||||||
Minar VS Middelkoop Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ivo Minar | Matwe Middelkoop |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 24 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Ivo Minar past matches
Before:
|
|
Prague Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Jul 2017 Q2 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Roman Safiullin
Player
Ivo Minar
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Jul 2017 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Ivo Minar
Player
David Simunek
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Czech Republic F5 (Pardubice) | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Dennis Novak
Player
Ivo Minar
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Greece F3 (Heraklion) | ||||||||
|
21 Mar 2017 R1 |
6
4
6
1
|
L
|
Alexander Lazov
Player
Ivo Minar
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 Mar 2017 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Matwe Middelkoop past matches
Before:
|
|
Davis Cup, World Group, PO, NED-SVK 4-0 | ||||||||
|
05 Feb 2023 Rubber 4 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
Ricoh Open - 's-Hertogenbosch | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2017 Q1 |
6
7
6
1
6
3
|
L
|
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
15
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
25 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sophia Antipolis Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 Apr 2017 Q1 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Irving Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Mar 2017 R1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Dustin Brown
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Mar 2017 QF |
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Tommy Paul
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Minar VS Middelkoop matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ivo Minar | Matwe Middelkoop |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (93/64) | 56% (77/61) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (203/156) | 56% (177/141) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (1753/1617) | 53% (1548/1389) |
| Hard W/L | 59% (93/64) | 56% (77/61) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.2 | 0.13 |
| Total Aces | 324 | 186 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 | 0.12 |
| Total Double Faults | 122 | 171 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 960.31 | 1089.98 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (2357/3985) | 61% (2449/4010) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (1661/2326) | 66% (1614/2449) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (815/1595) | 50% (773/1554) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (134/321) | 42% (145/344) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (1311/3673) | 37% (1412/3822) |
| Slam W/L | 25% (4/12) | 44% (7/9) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (33/19) | 38% (5/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (25/14) | 48% (24/26) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (25/12) | 69% (40/18) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (91/150) | 56% (77/137) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 46% (24/52) | 46% (17/37) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 61% (22/36) | 47% (20/43) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (90/82) | 85% (80/68) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (90/8) | 15% (80/12) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (67/11) | 16% (58/9) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Minar VS Middelkoop H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Assche Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Delage Vs Burruchaga Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Berrettini Vs Daniel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Urgesi Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Pegula Vs Swiatek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 13th May 2026 (Day 10)
-
Assche Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Delage Vs Burruchaga Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Berrettini Vs Daniel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Urgesi Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 13th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Pegula Vs Swiatek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 13th May 2026 (Day 10)
