Go Soeda vs Adam Feeney H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Soeda VS Feeney Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Go Soeda and Adam Feeney stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 31-05-2007 in the Second Round at the Busan Open Challenger Tennis - Busan, Soeda got the win with 7-6(1) 3-6 6-3. Soeda stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Feeney is no. Ret..
Go Soeda
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
47 ( 23-07-12)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Adam Feeney
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
248 ( 10-09-07)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
1
Total
0
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
41 (05-09-1984)
Age
41 (07-03-1985)
178
Height
178
73
Weight
70
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Unknown
Davide Sanguinetti
Coach
Shane Fox
2003
Turned Pro
58% (658-471)
Career Total W/L
56% (292-233)
61% (476-305)
Career Hard W/L
58% (229-167)
38% (19-31)
Career Clay W/L
46% (25-29)
47% (39-44)
Career Grass W/L
57% (26-20)
58% (124-91)
Career Indoor W/L
41% (12-17)
$791,590
Career Prize Money
$15,265
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Soeda VS Feeney H2H Matches played
|
Busan Open Challenger Tennis - Busan | ||||||||
|
31 May 2007 R2 |
7
6
3
6
6
3
|
||||||||
Soeda VS Feeney Head to head matches stats
| stats | Go Soeda | Adam Feeney |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Go Soeda past matches
Before:
|
|
Rakuten Japan Open - Tokyo | ||||||||
|
01 Oct 2022 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Go Soeda
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
Zagreb Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 May 2022 QF |
6
4
6
0
|
L
|
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Go Soeda
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Prague 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 May 2022 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Clement Tabur
Player
Go Soeda
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
St. Brieuc Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Mar 2022 R1 |
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Go Soeda
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Biel Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Mar 2022 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Kacper Zuk
Player
Go Soeda
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Adam Feeney past matches
Before:
|
|
Traralgon Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 Oct 2013 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Bumpei Sato
Player
Adam Feeney
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Melbourne Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Oct 2013 R1 |
1
6
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Andrew Whittington
Player
Adam Feeney
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
13
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Australia F10 | ||||||||
|
14 Oct 2013 QF |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
14 Oct 2013 R2 |
6
4
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
14 Oct 2013 R1 |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Soeda VS Feeney matches vs all opponents
| stats | Go Soeda | Adam Feeney |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (476/305) | 58% (229/167) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 58% (1043/753) | 58% (523/384) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (8942/7999) | 53% (4547/3958) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (476/305) | 58% (229/167) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Total Aces | 1469 | 137 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 1086 | 231 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 884.31 | 1158.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (18625/32083) | 64% (1855/2914) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (12884/18625) | 67% (1242/1855) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (7053/13458) | 43% (453/1059) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (1382/3295) | 44% (98/222) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (13106/32802) | 37% (996/2673) |
| Slam W/L | 42% (24/33) | 22% (2/7) |
| Masters W/L | 26% (6/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 45% (40/48) | 36% (5/9) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (337/178) | 50% (56/57) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (62/26) | 64% (166/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (458/750) | 58% (223/385) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (8/19) | 60% (3/5) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 58% (126/217) | 47% (53/113) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (125/221) | 43% (50/116) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (467/412) | 84% (246/207) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (467/55) | 15% (246/38) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (313/62) | 15% (150/22) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Soeda VS Feeney H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
