Enzo Machizaud vs Filip Veger H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Machizaud VS Veger Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Enzo Machizaud and Filip Veger stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 31-08-2014 in the Q2 round Round at the St. Remy Challenger, Veger got the win with 6-3 6-1. Machizaud stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Veger is no. Ret..
Enzo Machizaud
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Filip Veger
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
478 ( 16-02-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
31 (12-10-1994)
Age
31 (21-12-1994)
Height
Weight
Plays
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
35% (6-11)
Career Total W/L
51% (150-142)
33% (2-4)
Career Hard W/L
58% (37-27)
40% (2-3)
Career Clay W/L
39% (29-45)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-1)
33% (2-4)
Career Indoor W/L
55% (84-69)
$0
Career Prize Money
$6,370
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Machizaud VS Veger H2H Matches played
|
St. Remy Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Aug 2014 Q2 |
Filip Veger
Player
Enzo Machizaud
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6
3
6
1
|
|||||||
Machizaud VS Veger Head to head matches stats
| stats | Enzo Machizaud | Filip Veger |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 0:53:59 | 0:53:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (24/47) | 56% (23/41) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) | 83% (19/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) | 67% (12/18) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 100% (1/1) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Pts Won % | 24% (10/41) | 55% (26/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Enzo Machizaud past matches
Before:
|
|
Tunisia F41 (Monastir) | ||||||||
|
17 Nov 2018 Q1 |
6
0
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Tunisia F40 (Monastir) | ||||||||
|
12 Nov 2018 Q2 |
6
7
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
11 Nov 2018 Q1 |
3
6
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
France F20 (Nevers) | ||||||||
|
29 Sep 2018 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Antoine Damiens
Player
Enzo Machizaud
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
97%
(
31 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
4 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
France F18 (Plaisir) | ||||||||
|
17 Sep 2018 QF |
6
1
6
2
|
L
|
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Enzo Machizaud
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Filip Veger past matches
Before:
|
Serbia F4 (Zlatibor) | ||||||||
|
29 Aug 2017 R1 |
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
Viktor Filipenko
Player
Filip Veger
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
H2H | |||||
|
Czech Republic F12 | ||||||||
|
07 Dec 2016 R2 |
7
5
3
0
|
L
|
Jan Hernych
Player
Filip Veger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Dec 2016 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Filip Veger
Player
Arturs Lazdins
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Czech Republic F11 | ||||||||
|
01 Dec 2016 QF |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Filip Veger
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 Nov 2016 R2 |
6
3
6
1
|
W
|
Filip Veger
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Machizaud VS Veger matches vs all opponents
| stats | Enzo Machizaud | Filip Veger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 58% (37/27) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 36% (5/9) | 57% (84/64) |
| Games Won/Lost | 42% (54/75) | 54% (726/620) |
| Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 58% (37/27) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 0.22 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 143 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 13 | 94 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:1:1 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 834.17 | 1008.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (46/95) | 72% (2171/3024) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 61% (28/46) | 67% (1445/2171) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (22/49) | 49% (417/853) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (7/16) | 46% (156/342) |
| Return Points Won % | 43% (46/106) | 43% (1261/2949) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (30/15) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 37% (7/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) | 57% (36/63) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 67% (2/3) | 45% (5/11) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 47% (9/19) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 82% (39/32) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) | 18% (39/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) | 20% (25/5) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Machizaud VS Veger H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Knutson Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Borges Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nordea Open – Bastad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Collignon Vs Sonego Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Knutson Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Borges Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nordea Open – Bastad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Collignon Vs Sonego Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
