Dominik Suc vs Flavio Cipolla H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Suc VS Cipolla Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Dominik Suc and Flavio Cipolla stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 02-08-2015 in the Q2 round Round at the Liberec Challenger, Cipolla got the win with 6-2 7-6(3). Suc stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Cipolla is no. Ret..
Dominik Suc
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
626 ( 15-09-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Flavio Cipolla
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
70 ( 23-04-12)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
1
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
35 (19-09-1990)
Age
42 (20-10-1983)
175
Height
173
71
Weight
74
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
One-Handed
Coach
Turned Pro
2003
53% (109-95)
Career Total W/L
54% (474-404)
22% (2-7)
Career Hard W/L
60% (140-95)
56% (88-69)
Career Clay W/L
55% (274-225)
50% (1-1)
Career Grass W/L
45% (14-17)
50% (18-18)
Career Indoor W/L
41% (46-67)
$0
Career Prize Money
$656,393
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Suc VS Cipolla H2H Matches played
|
Liberec Challenger | ||||||||
|
02 Aug 2015 Q2 |
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Dominik Suc
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6
2
7
6
|
|||||||
Suc VS Cipolla Head to head matches stats
| stats | Dominik Suc | Flavio Cipolla |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:33:29 | 1:33:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) | 82% (51/62) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 55% (23/42) | 65% (33/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) | 73% (8/11) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (2/4) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Pts Won % | 34% (21/62) | 48% (32/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Dominik Suc past matches
Before:
|
Czech Republic F9 (Milovice) | ||||||||
|
06 Nov 2017 Q1 |
6
2
1
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Liberec Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 Jul 2017 Q1 |
7
5
3
6
6
3
|
W
|
Dominik Suc
Player
Matej Vocel
49%
(
46 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Jul 2017 Q2 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Juan Ignacio Galarza
Player
Dominik Suc
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Czech Republic F3 (Jablonec Nad Nisou) | ||||||||
|
29 May 2017 Q2 |
6
0
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
29 May 2017 QF |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Flavio Cipolla past matches
Before:
|
Greece F3 (Heraklion) | ||||||||
|
14 Mar 2018 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Marko Tepavac
Player
Flavio Cipolla
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Turkey F8 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
04 Mar 2018 F |
6
3
6
0
|
L
|
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Flavio Cipolla
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 Mar 2018 SF |
6
3
7
6
|
W
|
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
02 Mar 2018 QF |
6
2
6
1
|
W
|
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Altug Celikbilek
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
H2H | |||||
|
01 Mar 2018 R2 |
6
1
6
3
|
W
|
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Orlando Luz
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Suc VS Cipolla matches vs all opponents
| stats | Dominik Suc | Flavio Cipolla |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 60% (140/95) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 32% (7/15) | 55% (307/249) |
| Games Won/Lost | 41% (78/112) | 52% (2609/2401) |
| Hard W/L | 22% (2/7) | 60% (140/95) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Total Aces | 7 | 188 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 | 0.25 |
| Total Double Faults | 13 | 617 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 900.33 | 897.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (167/254) | 69% (8276/12003) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 62% (103/167) | 64% (5278/8276) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (35/87) | 48% (1786/3728) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 46% (12/26) | 46% (642/1386) |
| Return Points Won % | 43% (101/237) | 43% (5240/12166) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (20/17) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/11) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 49% (19/20) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (76/39) |
| Futures W/L | 22% (2/7) | 64% (14/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 22% (2/9) | 60% (130/217) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/15) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (1/2) | 60% (26/43) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) | 66% (44/67) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) | 90% (126/113) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) | 10% (126/13) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (6/0) | 23% (108/25) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Suc VS Cipolla H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
