Dennis Novikov vs Reid Carleton H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Novikov VS Carleton Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Dennis Novikov and Reid Carleton stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 09-07-2012 in the Second Round at the USA F19, Carleton got the win with 6-3 7-6(3). Novikov stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Carleton is no. Ret..
Dennis Novikov
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
119 ( 15-08-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Reid Carleton
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
449 ( 15-04-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
1
Total
1
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
1
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
32 (06-11-1993)
Age
37 (27-02-1989)
193
Height
91
Weight
Right-Handed
Plays
Two-Handed
Backhand
Vladimir Novikov
Coach
2013
Turned Pro
52% (247-232)
Career Total W/L
54% (43-36)
55% (159-130)
Career Hard W/L
58% (23-17)
44% (37-47)
Career Clay W/L
54% (20-17)
58% (23-17)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
42% (28-38)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-2)
$306,845
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Novikov VS Carleton H2H Matches played
Novikov VS Carleton Head to head matches stats
| stats | Dennis Novikov | Reid Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 25 | 27 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Dennis Novikov past matches
Before:
|
M15 Orange Park 1 | ||||||||
|
20 Apr 2022 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Kyle Kang
Player
Dennis Novikov
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
19 Apr 2022 QF |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
18 Apr 2022 Q1 |
6
1
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
M25 Calabasas 1 | ||||||||
|
23 Mar 2022 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Jc Aragone
Player
Dennis Novikov
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
74)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Mar 2022 QF |
4
6
7
6
10
5
|
W
|
Dennis Novikov
Player
Aidan Mayo
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Reid Carleton past matches
Before:
view more
Novikov VS Carleton matches vs all opponents
| stats | Dennis Novikov | Reid Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 55% (159/130) | 58% (23/17) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (365/323) | 57% (56/42) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (3430/3352) | 53% (467/408) |
| Hard W/L | 55% (159/130) | 58% (23/17) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.46 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 1515 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| Total Double Faults | 707 | 7 |
| Average Match Time | 1:1:35 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 862.8 | 1125.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (8409/14725) | 68% (64/94) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (6129/8409) | 61% (39/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3143/6316) | 43% (13/30) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 38% (428/1134) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points Won % | 35% (4841/13705) | 38% (39/103) |
| Slam W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 49% (68/70) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (72/35) | 58% (21/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (156/284) | 59% (23/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 53% (74/139) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (61/107) | 47% (9/19) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (162/131) | 81% (21/17) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (162/31) | 19% (21/4) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (127/28) | 32% (19/6) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Novikov VS Carleton H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Liu Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Struff Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Liu Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Pegula Vs Maneiro Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
