Demian Raab vs Ti Chen H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Raab VS Chen Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Demian Raab and Ti Chen stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 30-11-2015 in the First Round at the Thailand F9, Chen got the win with 6-2 6-1. Raab stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Chen is no. Ret..
Demian Raab
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
817 ( 04-04-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Ti Chen
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
184 ( 14-09-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
0
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
32 (20-07-1993)
Age
42 (03-10-1983)
188
Height
178
79
Weight
73
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Unknown
Coach
Turned Pro
2002
46% (70-81)
Career Total W/L
60% (683-461)
41% (7-10)
Career Hard W/L
62% (621-380)
48% (59-64)
Career Clay W/L
38% (13-21)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
25% (3-9)
36% (4-7)
Career Indoor W/L
47% (46-51)
$0
Career Prize Money
$57,495
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Raab VS Chen H2H Matches played
|
Thailand F9 | ||||||||
|
30 Nov 2015 R1 |
Ti Chen
Player
Demian Raab
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6
2
6
1
|
|||||||
Raab VS Chen Head to head matches stats
| stats | Demian Raab | Ti Chen |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (34/61) | 74% (29/39) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 47% (16/34) | 86% (25/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) | 70% (7/10) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 27% (4/15) |
| Return Pts Won % | 18% (7/39) | 51% (31/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Demian Raab past matches
Before:
|
Italy F27 (Santa Margherita Di Pula) | ||||||||
|
11 Sep 2018 R1 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Jannik Sinner
Player
Demian Raab
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
H2H | |||||
|
08 Sep 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Italy F9 (Santa Margherita Di Pula) | ||||||||
|
23 Apr 2018 R1 |
6
4
6
0
|
L
|
Filip Horansky
Player
Demian Raab
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
Germany F16 (Hamburg) | ||||||||
|
23 Oct 2017 Q1 |
6
0
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
23 Oct 2017 Q2 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Ti Chen past matches
Before:
|
|
M15 Nonthaburi 2 | ||||||||
|
04 Dec 2019 R1 |
6
3
3
6
3
0
|
L
|
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Hua Hin 3 | ||||||||
|
02 Sep 2019 Q1 |
6
3
3
6
10
3
|
L
|
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Hua Hin 2 | ||||||||
|
28 Aug 2019 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
27 Aug 2019 QF |
7
5
7
5
|
W
|
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 Aug 2019 Q1 |
4
6
7
5
10
2
|
W
|
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Raab VS Chen matches vs all opponents
| stats | Demian Raab | Ti Chen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 62% (621/380) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 46% (18/21) | 59% (1352/941) |
| Games Won/Lost | 49% (165/174) | 54% (11517/9754) |
| Hard W/L | 41% (7/10) | 62% (621/380) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Total Aces | 14 | 773 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 0.05 |
| Total Double Faults | 18 | 557 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1195.12 | 106.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (294/468) | 66% (15309/23161) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 66% (194/294) | 66% (10095/15309) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (84/174) | 51% (4004/7852) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (17/42) | 43% (972/2270) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (183/477) | 40% (9093/22737) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (3/9) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (9/10) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (10/15) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (165/183) |
| Futures W/L | 41% (7/10) | 73% (434/160) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (7/17) | 62% (607/974) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 29% (5/17) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 67% (2/3) | 52% (141/269) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 20% (1/5) | 61% (173/282) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (8/6) | 90% (569/512) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (8/2) | 10% (569/57) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (9/1) | 25% (430/107) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Raab VS Chen H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Tan Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Raducanu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Tomljanovic Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Krejcikova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Tan Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Raducanu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Tomljanovic Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Krejcikova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
