Debasis Sahoo vs Edison Ambarzumjan H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Sahoo VS Ambarzumjan Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Debasis Sahoo and Edison Ambarzumjan stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 03-09-2025 in the First Round at the M15 Hurghada 1, Ambarzumjan got the win with 6-2 7-6(4). Sahoo stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Ambarzumjan is no. -.
Ranking
- ( 14-05-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
- ( 14-05-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sahoo VS Ambarzumjan H2H Matches played
|
|
M15 Hurghada 1 | ||||||||
|
03 Sep 2025 R1 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Debasis Sahoo
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6
2
7
6
|
|||||||
Sahoo VS Ambarzumjan Head to head matches stats
| stats | Debasis Sahoo | Edison Ambarzumjan |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 1:58:38 | 1:58:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (52/81) | 70% (48/69) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 62% (32/52) | 69% (33/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) | 52% (11/21) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (2/6) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Pts Won % | 36% (25/69) | 44% (36/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Debasis Sahoo past matches
|
|
M15 Hyderabad 2 | ||||||||
|
26 Jan 2026 QF |
4
6
6
3
10
4
|
L
|
Dmitry Dolzhenkov
Player
Debasis Sahoo
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 Jan 2026 Q1 |
7
5
7
6
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Chennai 1 | ||||||||
|
12 Jan 2026 Q1 |
6
2
4
6
10
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Bhubaneswar 1 | ||||||||
|
19 Nov 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
0
|
L
|
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Debasis Sahoo
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Sharm ElSheikh 16 | ||||||||
|
02 Nov 2025 Q1 |
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Edison Ambarzumjan past matches
|
|
M15 Gaborone | ||||||||
|
13 May 2026 R1 |
4
6
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Gray Voelzke
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tarragona 1 | ||||||||
|
22 Mar 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Zadar Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Mar 2026 Q1 |
6
0
6
2
|
L
|
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Faro 1 | ||||||||
|
05 Mar 2026 R2 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Justin Boulais
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 Mar 2026 R1 |
7
5
6
4
|
W
|
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Tim Handel
46%
(
32 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
9
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Sahoo VS Ambarzumjan matches vs all opponents
| stats | Debasis Sahoo | Edison Ambarzumjan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) | 52% (26/24) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 39% (12/19) | 53% (58/52) |
| Games Won/Lost | 45% (136/167) | 52% (540/508) |
| Hard W/L | 36% (5/9) | 52% (26/24) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| Total Aces | 11 | 72 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 | 0.15 |
| Total Double Faults | 13 | 78 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:3:39 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 376.14 | 349.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (226/339) | 60% (1286/2142) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 58% (131/226) | 62% (802/1286) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (52/113) | 49% (420/856) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 36% (9/25) | 46% (94/206) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (107/299) | 41% (870/2143) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 36% (5/9) | 53% (25/22) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (5/14) | 52% (26/50) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 33% (1/3) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (5/4) | 90% (29/26) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (5/1) | 10% (29/3) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (9/1) | 0% (21/0) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Sahoo VS Ambarzumjan H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Carabelli Vs Berrettini Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Zandschulp Vs Halys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Carabelli Vs Berrettini Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Zandschulp Vs Halys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)