Cosimo Banti vs Matteo Mesaglio H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com

By James Morris

Banti VS Mesaglio Head to Head: 2 - 0

The H2H record between Cosimo Banti and Matteo Mesaglio stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 24-08-2025 in the Q1 round Round at the M15 Forli 1, Banti got the win with 5-7 6-4 10-7. Banti stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Mesaglio is no. -.

Banti vs Mesaglio Prediction H2H
ITA
Cosimo Banti

Ranking

- ( 05-06-26)

Best Rank

( 01-01-70)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Banti vs Mesaglio Prediction H2H
ITA
Matteo Mesaglio

Ranking

- ( 05-06-26)

Best Rank

( 01-01-70)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L

2

Total

0

1

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Banti VS Mesaglio H2H Matches played

Banti VS Mesaglio Head to head matches stats

stats Cosimo Banti Matteo Mesaglio
All Head to Head Matches 2 0
Sets Won 4 2
Games Won 40 37
Total Aces 0 0
Total Double Faults 0 0
Average Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Break Points Won % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts Won % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win % 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0) 0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0) 100% (2/2)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)

Cosimo Banti past matches

Clay M15 Klagenfurt

18 May

2026

QF

4 6
6 2
10 6
L
cross
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Cosimo Banti
63% ( 34 of 54)
1st Serve %
71% ( 55 of 77)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
65% ( 22 of 34)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 30 of 55)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
33% ( 18 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 37 of 77)
73
Total Points Won
58
H2H

17 May

2026

Q1

6 2
6 1
W
H2H
Clay M25 Reggio Emilia

11 May

2026

QF

6 4
6 1
L
cross
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Cosimo Banti
76% ( 41 of 54)
1st Serve %
62% ( 39 of 63)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
12
63% ( 26 of 41)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 25 of 39)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 5 of 24)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
39% ( 21 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 33 of 63)
66
Total Points Won
51
H2H

10 May

2026

Q1

2 6
6 3
10 8
W
cross
Cosimo Banti
Player
Alessandro Coccioli
62% ( 39 of 63)
1st Serve %
62% ( 41 of 66)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
62% ( 24 of 39)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 24 of 41)
42% ( 10 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 13 of 25)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
46% ( 29 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 29 of 66)
63
Total Points Won
66
H2H
Clay M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7

16 Sep

2025

R1

6 3
6 3
L
cross
Mattias Pisanu
Player
Cosimo Banti
67% ( 38 of 57)
1st Serve %
51% ( 25 of 49)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
58% ( 22 of 38)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 17 of 25)
47% ( 9 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 4 of 24)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
46% ( 26 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 28 of 49)
59
Total Points Won
47
H2H

Matteo Mesaglio past matches

Hard M15 Monastir

13 May

2026

R1

6 2
7 6
L
cross
Cesar Bouchelaghem
Player
Matteo Mesaglio
66% ( 37 of 56)
1st Serve %
62% ( 46 of 74)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70% ( 26 of 37)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 27 of 46)
58% ( 11 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 3 of 3)
34% ( 19 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 36 of 74)
73
Total Points Won
57
H2H

12 May

2026

QF

6 3
6 1
W
cross
Matteo Mesaglio
Player
Alessio Babudri
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve %
57% ( 28 of 49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 20 of 28)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
19% ( 4 of 21)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
34% ( 19 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 25 of 49)
62
Total Points Won
43
H2H

11 May

2026

Q2

6 2
6 4
W
H2H
Hard M15 Monastir

06 May

2026

R1

6 3
6 2
L
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Matteo Mesaglio
58% ( 26 of 45)
1st Serve %
54% ( 25 of 46)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
85% ( 22 of 26)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 11 of 21)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
24% ( 11 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 23 of 46)
57
Total Points Won
34
H2H

05 May

2026

QF

3 6
6 1
10 6
W
cross
Matteo Mesaglio
Player
Gabriele Maria Piano
70% ( 40 of 57)
1st Serve %
58% ( 33 of 57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65% ( 26 of 40)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 23 of 33)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
40% ( 23 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 25 of 57)
59
Total Points Won
55
H2H

Banti VS Mesaglio matches vs all opponents

stats Cosimo Banti Matteo Mesaglio
YTD Win/Loss 33% (2/4) 60% (15/10)
Sets Won/Lost 31% (4/9) 57% (30/23)
Games Won/Lost 41% (48/69) 53% (264/231)
Hard W/L 33% (2/4) 60% (15/10)
Clay W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces Per Game 0 0.04
Total Aces 0 10
Double Faults Per Game 0 0.11
Total Double Faults 0 27
Average Opponent Rank 344.83 141.48
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 63% (393/625)
1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 60% (237/393)
2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 46% (107/232)
Total Break Points Won % 0% (0/0) 47% (27/58)
Return Points Won % 0% (0/0) 40% (237/593)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 33% (2/4) 60% (15/10)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 33% (2/6) 58% (14/24)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 0% (0/0) 33% (1/3)
Deciding Set Win % 100% (1/1) 75% (3/4)
1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (1/1) 93% (15/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (1/0) 7% (15/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 20% (5/1) 10% (10/1)
banner

Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.

SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Banti VS Mesaglio H2H

UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS

You Might Also Like