Clement Tabur vs Marcos Giraldi Requena H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Tabur VS Requena Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Clement Tabur and Marcos Giraldi Requena stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 13-06-2016 in the First Round at the France F10, Requena got the win with 6-3 3-6 6-1. Tabur stands at no. 165 in the rankings, whilst Requena is no. Ret..
Ranking
165 ( 21-05-26)
Best Rank
165 ( 18-05-26)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
463 ( 09-05-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Tabur VS Requena H2H Matches played
|
|
France F10 | ||||||||
|
13 Jun 2016 R1 |
Marcos Giraldi Requena
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6
3
3
6
6
1
|
|||||||
Tabur VS Requena Head to head matches stats
| stats | Clement Tabur | Marcos Giraldi Requena |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (50/81) | 61% (54/88) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 62% (31/50) | 65% (35/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) | 53% (18/34) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 30% (3/10) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Pts Won % | 40% (35/88) | 47% (38/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clement Tabur past matches
|
|
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva | ||||||||
|
19 May 2026 R1 |
7
6
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Clement Tabur
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
124)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 May 2026 QF |
0
6
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Clement Tabur
Player
Raul Brancaccio
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
|
16 May 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
Clement Tabur
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bordeaux Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 May 2026 Q1 |
7
6
1
6
6
4
|
L
|
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Clement Tabur
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
97
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2026 QF |
3
6
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Clement Tabur
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
111)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
100
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Marcos Giraldi Requena past matches
|
|
Spain F29 (Sabadell) | ||||||||
|
27 Sep 2018 R2 |
6
1
4
1
|
L
|
Omar Salman
Player
Marcos Giraldi Requena
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 Sep 2018 R1 |
6
3
6
5
|
W
|
Marcos Giraldi Requena
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 Sep 2018 QF |
6
2
6
1
|
W
|
Marcos Giraldi Requena
Player
Pol Amoros Ramos
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Sep 2018 Q2 |
7
5
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
22 Sep 2018 Q1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Tabur VS Requena matches vs all opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Marcos Giraldi Requena |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 66% (88/46) | 47% (25/28) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 63% (193/114) | 51% (60/58) |
| Games Won/Lost | 55% (1570/1265) | 50% (546/541) |
| Hard W/L | 66% (88/46) | 47% (25/28) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.23 | 0.04 |
| Total Aces | 316 | 22 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 | 0.04 |
| Total Double Faults | 267 | 21 |
| Average Match Time | 1:29:17 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 582.38 | 913.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (4776/7669) | 58% (295/510) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3222/4776) | 61% (181/295) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1443/2892) | 40% (87/215) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 48% (420/870) | 44% (24/54) |
| Return Points Won % | 44% (3389/7785) | 40% (207/512) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (73/31) | 47% (25/28) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (88/134) | 47% (25/53) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 46% (12/26) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (22/39) | 17% (2/12) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (79/72) | 86% (28/24) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (79/7) | 14% (28/4) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (55/16) | 4% (25/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Tabur VS Requena H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Darderi Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Darderi Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Arango Vs Bondar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Nava Vs Wild Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP French Open – Paris – 20th May 2026 (Day -4)
-
Tjen Vs Serrano Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Darderi Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Darderi Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Arango Vs Bondar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Nava Vs Wild Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP French Open – Paris – 20th May 2026 (Day -4)
-
Tjen Vs Serrano Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 20th May 2026 (Day 3)
