Clay Thompson vs Nathaniel Lammons H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Thompson VS Lammons Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Clay Thompson and Nathaniel Lammons stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 29-06-2015 in the First Round at the USA F21, Thompson got the win with 4-6 6-3 6-3. Thompson stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Lammons is no. 595.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
408 ( 02-05-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
595 ( 14-07-26)
Best Rank
591 ( 14-01-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Thompson VS Lammons H2H Matches played
|
|
USA F21 | ||||||||
|
29 Jun 2015 R1 |
4
6
6
3
6
3
|
||||||||
Thompson VS Lammons Head to head matches stats
| stats | Clay Thompson | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Thompson past matches
|
|
USA F11 (Calabasas) | ||||||||
|
22 Mar 2017 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Clay Thompson
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F2 (Long Beach) | ||||||||
|
11 Jan 2017 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Evan King
Player
Clay Thompson
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F1 (Los Angeles) | ||||||||
|
06 Jan 2017 R2 |
7
5
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
03 Jan 2017 R1 |
6
1
6
2
|
W
|
Clay Thompson
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F28 | ||||||||
|
15 Sep 2016 R2 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Evan Zhu
Player
Clay Thompson
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nathaniel Lammons past matches
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 QF |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 May 2026 Q1 |
6
3
3
6
7
5
|
W
|
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Adrian Boitan
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
116)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
12
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Guangzhou Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Sep 2025 Q1 |
5
7
7
5
1
2
|
L
|
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
7
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
19 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Charlottesville Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Oct 2021 Q1 |
6
0
6
2
|
L
|
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Oct 2021 Q1 |
6
4
4
6
7
6
|
L
|
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Thompson VS Lammons matches vs all opponents
| stats | Clay Thompson | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (72/54) | 60% (50/33) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (163/127) | 61% (119/76) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (1464/1307) | 55% (987/805) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (72/54) | 60% (50/33) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.27 |
| Total Aces | 432 | 235 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 314 | 124 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 903.86 | 889.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (2512/4269) | 60% (1677/2818) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (1824/2512) | 71% (1194/1677) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (861/1757) | 50% (574/1141) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (142/358) | 42% (93/223) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (1540/4254) | 36% (1006/2810) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (14/17) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (57/33) | 63% (45/26) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (70/124) | 61% (50/82) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 45% (19/42) | 52% (13/25) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 47% (18/38) | 39% (11/28) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (74/64) | 83% (53/44) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (74/10) | 17% (53/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (52/7) | 23% (30/7) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Thompson VS Lammons H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Lajovic Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Jacquet Vs Trungelliti Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Yaneva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA ATV Bancomat Tennis Open – Rome – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Okamura Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Morvayova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Jacquet Vs Trungelliti Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Lajovic Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Yaneva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA ATV Bancomat Tennis Open – Rome – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Okamura Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Morvayova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
