Christopher Marquis vs Sameer Kumar H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Marquis VS Kumar Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Christopher Marquis and Sameer Kumar stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 20-07-2015 in the First Round at the USA F22, Kumar got the win with 6-2 6-2. Marquis stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Kumar is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1046 ( 12-01-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1258 ( 12-06-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Marquis VS Kumar H2H Matches played
|
|
USA F22 | ||||||||
|
20 Jul 2015 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
||||||||
Marquis VS Kumar Head to head matches stats
| stats | Christopher Marquis | Sameer Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Christopher Marquis past matches
|
|
USA F6 (Palm Coast) | ||||||||
|
27 Jan 2018 Pre-Q |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Turkey F16 | ||||||||
|
18 Apr 2016 Q1 |
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Pune Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 Oct 2015 Q1 |
6
1
6
3
|
L
|
Suraj R Prabodh
Player
Christopher Marquis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bangalore Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 Oct 2015 QF |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Temur Ismailov
Player
Christopher Marquis
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
11
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2015 Q1 |
7
5
2
6
6
4
|
W
|
Christopher Marquis
Player
Vignesh Peranamallur-Chandrasekhar
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Sameer Kumar past matches
|
|
USA F25 (Laguna Niguel) | ||||||||
|
18 Sep 2018 QF |
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
17 Sep 2018 Q2 |
6
3
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
16 Sep 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
15 Sep 2018 Pre-Q |
6
1
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F24 (Claremont) | ||||||||
|
10 Sep 2018 Q2 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Marquis VS Kumar matches vs all opponents
| stats | Christopher Marquis | Sameer Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 41% (31/45) | 68% (25/12) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 41% (70/100) | 67% (52/26) |
| Games Won/Lost | 46% (718/831) | 59% (404/286) |
| Hard W/L | 41% (31/45) | 68% (25/12) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Total Aces | 35 | 19 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 51 | 19 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1107.43 | 901.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (371/650) | 65% (334/513) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (256/371) | 65% (217/334) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (113/279) | 50% (90/179) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (17/42) | 45% (24/53) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (190/593) | 41% (209/512) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 23% (3/10) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 44% (27/34) | 74% (25/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (30/73) | 68% (25/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (7/14) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 62% (13/21) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (31/25) | 96% (24/23) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (31/6) | 4% (24/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (45/6) | 15% (13/2) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Marquis VS Kumar H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kawa Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Angelo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Timofeeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Dodig Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gibert Vs Kalinina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Kawa Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Angelo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Timofeeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Dodig Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Gibert Vs Kalinina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA UniCredit Iasi Open – Iasi – 14th July 2026 (Day 2)
