Chris Eaton vs Marcio Torres H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Eaton VS Torres Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Chris Eaton and Marcio Torres stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 26-06-2006 in the First Round at the Turkey F3, Eaton got the win with 7-5 6-4. Eaton stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Torres is no. Ret..
Chris Eaton
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
317 ( 15-06-09)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Marcio Torres
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
712 ( 20-08-07)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
1
Total
0
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
38 (27-11-1987)
Age
45 (24-01-1981)
Height
185
76
Weight
75
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Unknown
Backhand
Unknown
Coach
Bruno Coelho
Turned Pro
2003
49% (194-198)
Career Total W/L
35% (73-136)
54% (94-81)
Career Hard W/L
37% (44-75)
25% (3-9)
Career Clay W/L
36% (23-41)
46% (28-33)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-1)
48% (69-75)
Career Indoor W/L
24% (6-19)
$35,865
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Eaton VS Torres H2H Matches played
|
Turkey F3 | ||||||||
|
26 Jun 2006 R1 |
7
5
6
4
|
||||||||
Eaton VS Torres Head to head matches stats
| stats | Chris Eaton | Marcio Torres |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Chris Eaton past matches
Before:
|
Wimbledon - London | ||||||||
|
19 Jun 2012 Q2 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
18 Jun 2012 Q1 |
7
6
4
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
AEGON Championships - London | ||||||||
|
09 Jun 2012 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Chris Eaton
Player
Romain Jouan
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 Jun 2012 Q2 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Sergei Bubka
Player
Chris Eaton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
10
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Nottingham Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Jun 2012 Q1 |
6
3
3
6
6
2
|
L
|
Mischa Zverev
Player
Chris Eaton
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
4
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Marcio Torres past matches
Before:
view more
Eaton VS Torres matches vs all opponents
| stats | Chris Eaton | Marcio Torres |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 54% (94/81) | 37% (44/75) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 54% (209/180) | 38% (102/164) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (1874/1773) | 46% (1111/1310) |
| Hard W/L | 54% (94/81) | 37% (44/75) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 46 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 31 | 0 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1116.49 | 1085.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (502/753) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 66% (332/502) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (119/251) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 36% (24/67) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (276/730) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (33/25) | 37% (22/38) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (60/55) | 37% (22/37) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (92/171) | 37% (43/117) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 49% (22/45) | 46% (11/24) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 47% (20/43) | 46% (13/28) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (96/84) | 81% (47/38) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (96/11) | 19% (47/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (79/10) | 7% (72/5) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Eaton VS Torres H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Liu Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Struff Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Alexandrova Vs Jovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Liu Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Struff Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Alexandrova Vs Jovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
