Chase Buchanan vs Hugo Di Feo H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Buchanan VS Feo Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Chase Buchanan and Hugo Di Feo stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 17-09-2012 in the Second Round at the Canada F9, Buchanan got the win with 6-1 6-3. Buchanan stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Feo is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
158 ( 18-08-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
896 ( 19-05-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Buchanan VS Feo H2H Matches played
|
|
Canada F9 | ||||||||
|
17 Sep 2012 R2 |
6
1
6
3
|
||||||||
Buchanan VS Feo Head to head matches stats
| stats | Chase Buchanan | Hugo Di Feo |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Chase Buchanan past matches
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 Nov 2015 R1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Chase Buchanan
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
16 Nov 2015 QF |
6
1
4
6
6
2
|
W
|
Chase Buchanan
Player
Jonathan Ho
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
42%
(
36 of
85)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Nov 2015 Q2 |
6
3
2
6
7
5
|
W
|
Chase Buchanan
Player
David O'Hare
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
18 of
70)
85
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Nov 2015 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Chase Buchanan
Player
Luca Margaroli
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Charlottesville Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Nov 2015 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Tommy Paul
Player
Chase Buchanan
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hugo Di Feo past matches
|
|
Gatineau Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Jul 2017 Q2 |
6
2
4
6
6
1
|
L
|
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Hugo Di Feo
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Jul 2017 Q1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Alexis Galarneau
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Winnipeg Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Bradley Mousley
Player
Hugo Di Feo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F22 (Pittsburgh) | ||||||||
|
30 Jun 2017 QF |
6
3
6
0
|
L
|
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Hugo Di Feo
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Jun 2017 R2 |
6
4
|
W
|
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Roy Smith
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
13 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Buchanan VS Feo matches vs all opponents
| stats | Chase Buchanan | Hugo Di Feo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 45% (54/65) | 38% (16/26) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 46% (124/147) | 42% (39/54) |
| Games Won/Lost | 49% (1233/1294) | 47% (398/447) |
| Hard W/L | 45% (54/65) | 38% (16/26) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| Total Aces | 235 | 11 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 268 | 26 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 971.55 | 1000.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (3265/5180) | 64% (256/398) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2209/3265) | 56% (143/256) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (903/1915) | 43% (61/142) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 45% (188/415) | 46% (19/41) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (1734/4657) | 40% (160/403) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (31/28) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 39% (15/23) | 38% (12/20) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (54/118) | 39% (16/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 34% (12/35) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (16/32) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (53/45) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (53/8) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (66/9) | 8% (24/2) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Buchanan VS Feo H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Tsitsipas Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 1st July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Kudermetova Vs Samsonova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lehecka Vs Popyrin Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shnaider Vs Lys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Altmaier Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Tsitsipas Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 1st July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Kudermetova Vs Samsonova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lehecka Vs Popyrin Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shnaider Vs Lys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Altmaier Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
