Cem Ilkel vs Christopher Heyman H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ilkel VS Heyman Head to Head: 0 - 2
The H2H record between Cem Ilkel and Christopher Heyman stands at 0 - 2. In their last encounter on 29-05-2016 in the Final Round at the Turkey F21, Heyman got the win with 6-3 7-6(5). Ilkel stands at no. 807 in the rankings, whilst Heyman is no. Ret..
Cem Ilkel
Ranking
807 ( 23-04-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Christopher Heyman
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
258 ( 19-02-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
0
Total
2
0
Hard
2
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (21-08-1995)
Age
32 (08-10-1993)
185
Height
188
81
Weight
90
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
One-Handed
Gavin Hopper
Coach
2013
Turned Pro
57% (438-337)
Career Total W/L
64% (352-201)
61% (288-181)
Career Hard W/L
66% (113-58)
45% (57-71)
Career Clay W/L
61% (154-98)
10% (1-9)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
55% (92-76)
Career Indoor W/L
65% (85-45)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Ilkel VS Heyman H2H Matches played
|
Turkey F21 | ||||||||
|
29 May 2016 F |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6
3
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
Turkey F20 | ||||||||
|
21 May 2016 SF |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Cem Ilkel
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6
3
7
6
|
|||||||
Ilkel VS Heyman Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 18 | 26 |
| Total Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Total Double Faults | 9 | 7 |
| Average Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (79/144) | 68% (106/155) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (51/79) | 64% (68/106) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (29/65) | 53% (26/49) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 31% (5/16) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Pts Won % | 39% (61/155) | 44% (64/144) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel past matches
Before:
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Sharm ElSheikh 2 | ||||||||
|
26 Apr 2025 SF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Christopher Heyman past matches
Before:
|
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Jan 2023 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
M15 Lodz 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Jul 2022 R2 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
27 Jul 2022 R1 |
6
1
6
3
|
W
|
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Marburg 1 | ||||||||
|
07 Jul 2022 R2 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Jul 2022 R1 |
4
1
|
W
|
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ilkel VS Heyman matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (288/181) | 66% (113/58) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (631/440) | 63% (243/143) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5350/4741) | 56% (1958/1559) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (288/181) | 66% (113/58) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.16 |
| Total Aces | 1593 | 270 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 771 | 237 |
| Average Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 878.42 | 1018.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (12861/22032) | 67% (4569/6797) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9108/12861) | 68% (3113/4569) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4705/9171) | 52% (1162/2228) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (929/2274) | 48% (344/713) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (8844/22248) | 43% (2834/6668) |
| Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (79/72) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (198/90) | 68% (109/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (280/457) | 65% (110/168) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (87/156) | 54% (25/46) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/244) | 89% (111/99) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (280/34) | 11% (111/12) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) | 23% (60/14) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ilkel VS Heyman H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Zarazua Vs Giavara Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W100 Charlottesville – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Landaluce Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kjaer Vs Opelka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Osaka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Galfi Vs Kalinskaya Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Zarazua Vs Giavara Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W100 Charlottesville – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Landaluce Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kjaer Vs Opelka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Osaka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
-
Galfi Vs Kalinskaya Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 23rd April 2026 (Day 4)
