Cedrick Commin vs Tihomir Grozdanov H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Commin VS Grozdanov Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Cedrick Commin and Tihomir Grozdanov stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 23-06-2014 in the First Round at the Bulgaria F3, Commin got the win with 6-2 5-7 7-5. Commin stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Grozdanov is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
741 ( 14-07-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
394 ( 30-12-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Commin VS Grozdanov H2H Matches played
|
|
Bulgaria F3 | ||||||||
|
23 Jun 2014 R1 |
6
2
5
7
7
5
|
||||||||
Commin VS Grozdanov Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cedrick Commin | Tihomir Grozdanov |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 14 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Cedrick Commin past matches
view more
Tihomir Grozdanov past matches
|
|
M15 Varna 1 | ||||||||
|
09 Sep 2019 Q1 |
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Qatar F3 (Doha) | ||||||||
|
11 Mar 2018 Q2 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Tihomir Grozdanov
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Mar 2018 Q1 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Vasil Yehorov
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Qatar F2 (Doha) | ||||||||
|
05 Mar 2018 QF |
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Tihomir Grozdanov
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
04 Mar 2018 Q2 |
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Skyler Butts
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Commin VS Grozdanov matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cedrick Commin | Tihomir Grozdanov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 51% (27/26) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 20% (1/4) | 52% (62/58) |
| Games Won/Lost | 40% (19/28) | 51% (561/541) |
| Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 51% (27/26) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 12 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 | 0.05 |
| Total Double Faults | 9 | 25 |
| Average Match Time | 1:1:32 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 952.5 | 1012.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (45/89) | 62% (325/522) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 60% (27/45) | 66% (216/325) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) | 44% (87/197) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (4/12) | 52% (29/56) |
| Return Points Won % | 43% (40/94) | 44% (253/578) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 51% (25/24) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 51% (27/53) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 43% (6/14) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 85% (26/22) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 15% (26/4) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 19% (27/5) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Commin VS Grozdanov H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Humbert Vs Hijikata Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tiafoe Vs Aliassime Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Li Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Altmaier Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Bouzkova Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Humbert Vs Hijikata Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tiafoe Vs Aliassime Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Li Vs Golubic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Altmaier Vs Medvedev Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Terra Wortmann Open – Halle – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Bouzkova Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 19th June 2026 (Day 5)
