Cedric Stanke vs Christopher Heyman H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Stanke VS Heyman Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Cedric Stanke and Christopher Heyman stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 24-10-2016 in the Q2 round Round at the Germany F16, Heyman got the win with 6-1 6-1. Stanke stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Heyman is no. Ret..
Ranking
- ( 04-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
258 ( 19-02-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Stanke VS Heyman H2H Matches played
|
|
Germany F16 | ||||||||
|
24 Oct 2016 Q2 |
6
1
6
1
|
||||||||
Stanke VS Heyman Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cedric Stanke | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cedric Stanke past matches
|
|
M25 Nivelles | ||||||||
|
28 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Felix Romeo
Player
Cedric Stanke
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Brussels | ||||||||
|
22 Jun 2026 Q2 |
6
7
6
4
10
5
|
L
|
Axel Huysmans
Player
Cedric Stanke
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Sharm ElSheikh | ||||||||
|
22 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Cedric Stanke
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
21 Apr 2026 QF |
6
7
7
6
11
9
|
W
|
Cedric Stanke
Player
Aaron Funk
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 Apr 2026 Q2 |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Cedric Stanke
Player
Henrik Bergen
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Christopher Heyman past matches
|
|
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Jan 2023 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Lodz 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Jul 2022 R2 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
27 Jul 2022 R1 |
6
1
6
3
|
W
|
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Marburg 1 | ||||||||
|
07 Jul 2022 R2 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Jul 2022 R1 |
4
1
|
W
|
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Stanke VS Heyman matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cedric Stanke | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 58% (70/50) | 66% (113/58) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 58% (159/115) | 63% (243/143) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (1456/1282) | 56% (1958/1559) |
| Hard W/L | 58% (70/50) | 66% (113/58) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Total Aces | 227 | 270 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 123 | 237 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 256.32 | 1023.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (2251/3432) | 67% (4569/6797) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1546/2251) | 68% (3113/4569) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (590/1181) | 52% (1162/2228) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (126/309) | 48% (344/713) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (1317/3433) | 43% (2834/6668) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (70/50) | 68% (109/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (70/120) | 65% (110/168) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (14/28) | 54% (25/46) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 44% (15/34) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (71/61) | 89% (111/99) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (71/10) | 11% (111/12) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (49/9) | 23% (60/14) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Stanke VS Heyman H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Navarro Vs Kostyuk Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 4th July 2026 (Day 6)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Liu Vs Gauff Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Madison Keys vs Amanda Anisimova Wimbledon 2026 Preview
-
Navarro Vs Kostyuk Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 4th July 2026 (Day 6)
-
Fokina Vs Fucsovics Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Hurkacz Vs Paul Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Brooksby Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 3rd July 2026 (Day 5)
