Caleb Chakravarthi vs Nathaniel Lammons H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Chakravarthi VS Lammons Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Caleb Chakravarthi and Nathaniel Lammons stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 09-01-2017 in the Q2 round Round at the USA F2 (Long Beach), Lammons got the win with 6-3 7-6(3). Chakravarthi stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Lammons is no. 595.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
595 ( 11-06-26)
Best Rank
591 ( 14-01-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Chakravarthi VS Lammons H2H Matches played
|
|
USA F2 (Long Beach) | ||||||||
|
09 Jan 2017 Q2 |
6
3
7
6
|
||||||||
Chakravarthi VS Lammons Head to head matches stats
| stats | Caleb Chakravarthi | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Caleb Chakravarthi past matches
|
|
Dallas Open - Dallas | ||||||||
|
08 Feb 2022 R1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Caleb Chakravarthi
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Nov 2018 Q1 |
3
6
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Timur Khabibulin
Player
Caleb Chakravarthi
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
11
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F19 (Wichita) | ||||||||
|
01 Jul 2018 Q1 |
6
4
2
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F1 (Los Angeles) | ||||||||
|
31 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Nov 2017 Q1 |
4
6
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Noe Khlif
Player
Caleb Chakravarthi
73%
(
77 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nathaniel Lammons past matches
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 QF |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 May 2026 Q1 |
6
3
3
6
7
5
|
W
|
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Adrian Boitan
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
116)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
12
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Guangzhou Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Sep 2025 Q1 |
5
7
7
5
1
2
|
L
|
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
7
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
19 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Charlottesville Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Oct 2021 Q1 |
6
0
6
2
|
L
|
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Oct 2021 Q1 |
6
4
4
6
7
6
|
L
|
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Chakravarthi VS Lammons matches vs all opponents
| stats | Caleb Chakravarthi | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 60% (50/33) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 45% (13/16) | 61% (119/76) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (138/128) | 55% (987/805) |
| Hard W/L | 46% (6/7) | 60% (50/33) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.27 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 235 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 124 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 772.15 | 889.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (1677/2818) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1194/1677) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 50% (574/1141) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 42% (93/223) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 36% (1006/2810) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 46% (6/7) | 63% (45/26) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (6/13) | 61% (50/82) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 25% (1/4) | 52% (13/25) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) | 39% (11/28) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) | 83% (53/44) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) | 17% (53/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (7/0) | 23% (30/7) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Chakravarthi VS Lammons H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)